Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em?


Hi,

I'd love to hear the impressions of people who've actually spent some time with these speakers to share their sense of their plusses and minuses. Mapman here on Audiogon is a big fan, and has shared lots on them, but I'm wondering who else might be familiar with them.
rebbi
The 100s do go loud and clean.

Your amp would work fine and sound great I am certain.
Post removed 
Tvad,

I think that might cross the line between WAF and GFD (Grounds For Divorce).
01-14-09: Rebbi
Winegasman,
Good to hear! And you are happy with how the tube amp drives the speaks? There had been talk here earlier that the Ohms preferred SS gear.

Actually, I don't think speakers can prefer anything; only we can. I have no idea how they sound with SS because I don't have an SS amp. I have a 35wpc tube integrated that I like a lot, so that's what I'm using. My ears are probably too dense to appreciate sound the way an audiophile's ears can appreciate sound, but, yea, the Ohms sound wonderful with my amp, in my room, at this time. As I said, the system fills the room with palpable sound -- including engaging bass -- and does it with the volume gain at no more than 1 o'clock -- after that, my ears start to bleed. But that may just be me.
rebbi...sorry for the delayed reponse, but there are speakers that 'confess' their preference of fequency, by recordings such as the moody blues record i refered to. you'll find the ohms' balance makes 'days of future past' a really good listen....it's corny and spectacular.