KEF blades 2 or Dynaudio C4?


Hi guys, I am trying very soon the Luxman monos M900. I am wondering based on your experience and knowledge which speakers of these two would be a better match for them?
My room 18x12. High ceilings.
I prefer low volume music effortless neutral sound. I had owned KEF 3 and I liked them a lot.
But today I asked three dealers and I got mixed opinions. 
I do appreciate your time giving me your opinion. Kind regards.
Thank you.

mountainsong
Take this as you wish, we are a Kef dealer with the Blades on display so we ar going to be biased.

Over the years have heard the Dynaudio C4 and other similar models they sound good, but not amazing, they are smooth , good imagers, and they have respectable bass. The downside vs the Kef Blades is they don’t have the speed and articulation of the Blades, nor do they have the remarkable combination of image size and speficity of the Blades.

So if you like the Kef Rerference series you will be blown away by the Blades which sound even cleaner and more focused then the Ref series, the Blades are the only speaker that Kef makes which employ a lithium stiffening ring bonded to the Uni-Q which is one of the details that elevate the Blades over the Reference.

Dave and Troy
Audio Doctor NJ
Thank you. You are talking about big blades. I can't put th in my space. Blades 2 is what I am  thinking of. I was told ref 5 were basically the same but now you are making me realize it is not the case.
Thanks again.

>>Take this as you wish<<

I take this as a dealer pushing his product. 
Like most of your responses. 
Dealers will Always push what they carry! Some directly, some indirectly. I take what they say with a gigantic grain of salt. If I'm truly interested in a product I go listen and let my ears decide.