The 'tube-transistor' enigma by MC carts?

I was stunned to see that this was/is my own thread. From 2009!

I also had difficulty to recognize my own English.

Well the expression ''CORE-LESS''  may give the right direction

for our thoughts. ''Iron-core'' in the ''coil-former'' is used , like

by cheap inductors , to increase the cart output. As Lew put

it ''less coil wire'' is then needed reducing the moving mass.

Lukatatschek, the owner&designer by Benz , stated ''I don't like

iron'' anywhere in the signal  path and use ruby plate to wind

coils on. But his LP S (or mr.) has + 40 Ohms impedance

''suggesting'' much (more) wire. Mori san invented ''8 form

 coil-former'' for his series XL Sony MC's. Those coils are also

''core-less'' but the whole series, like Benz, has +40 Ohms

impedance ''implicating''  more wire. Ergo: those LOMC''s with

output around 0,2 mV or less are ''core-less'' with little wire

and with low impedance.

Addition, I don't know why exactly Lukatschek dislike ''iron''

(core) but he stated '' I don't like iron anywhere in the signal path''

(see above). I now remember his comment on Fremer's

review of his LP s. He blamed Fremer for using SUT by

his listening tests. One can see this as one more argument

against SUT's ( see Raul) but he used more wire for the

coils to get output at an ''reasonable level'' of 3.6 mV.

That is to say that one can avoid SUT's with this kind of

output.  I have no idea if SUT's can be made without iron

core . I am very fond with my Denon AU-S1 and don't

believe that this SUT uses any iron. But I also know that

''believing'' is not an strong argument.

Dear chakster, ''Great device to avoid SUT'' is obviously meant

to ''belittle'' your Slavic brother. But if I am well informed you just

bought some cheap Italian phono-pre dismissing this way your

technical praise about ZYX CPP-1. The other possible reason is

 your  effort  to sell this ZYX to me. I am sorry but I am happy

with my Basis Exclusive as well with my Klyne 7PX 3.5 + Denon

AU-S1.