Total cost of ownership - how to reduce it


Audiogon members love their music - but I am not alone, I think, in finding that the requirements in terms of cost and time for keeping the system running at optimal, can become too steep. Can we help each other out?

Today I have spent two hours trying to find a failed tube in my system. Two months ago I had a bad episode with a repair service that did not repair and did not return my stuff. Some weeks ago, I blew a speaker driver, I am still waiting for the replacement. Thinking, I need a tube tester, since my system has a lot of tubes - I got the tester, but it blew tubes, not "dead on arrival" but "over-excited" - and has to be repaired. I am perhaps especially unlucky. But I ask myself, how much is enough? When such experiences accumulate, I can understand people plugging into Mp3, it is simple and it works.

I have thought about my situation and diagnosed two main types of problems - maybe, relevant for other Audiogon members also.

The first is where you buy a thing used and then get it upgraded by the manufacturer. You pay quite a lot for this, and you would expect the whole thing is checked - but it is not. In two cases now, I have experienced that even if the upgrade works fine, the box as a whole is not checked, and develops problems a year or two after the upgrade.

The second case is where you pay for an upgrade that is more like a new build (e g of a speaker) or rebuild (of a cartridge). Now, there is no lagging wear and tear problem, but it turns out that the upgrade parameters were not fully developed, things have to be changed or checked afterwards (speaker drivers dont work optimal, needle not quite in place, etc).

I would be the first to recognize that some of these costs (time, mainly, but money also) should be accepted. I have paid local repair costs without complaining, and have used many hours of my own time. As an advanced user, I accept some extra costs.

It is just that, sometimes it gets too much.

I would like other Audiogon users' thoughts on this dilemma, and especially, what can we do to reduce the total ownership costs.

Your thoughts and experiences welcome.
Ag insider logo xs@2xo_holter
An update:Two fans running, very low cost computer fans, adjusted for low noise, without problems - behind my most critical tube components.

Regarding heat x time:
I think soldering close to mechanical parts is especially error-prone. Like volume potmeters, or even cable contacts that are much used.
Examples:My Jade OTL amp has developed scratching noise, once more, when I turn the volume.Last time it was poor soldering. Seems to be the same, now.
My Aesthetix Io phono preamp had to be repaired and the main error was in the volume controls (with a lot of soldering), they had to replaced.

Post removed 
Replacing tubes every couple of years is a negligible expense, as many great tubes aren't expensive, unless your amp has 14 tubes. Mine has 4. Besides, most tube amp owners enjoy trying different tubes and wind up with a collection of the things that insures decades of backup tubes, and rarely replace them simply due to them wearing out. The cost of a SS amp of equivalent musical quality can often be more than a simple tube amp's cost, obviating the tube cost issue. An exception could be when a tube amp owner finds a particular tube and has to stick with it as it offers something better than others...I just switched to Gold Lion KT77s in my SEP amp (it only has 2 power tubes) and can't imagine a better sounding tube in this amp, so more of these are likely in the future. There goes my tube theory.
Post removed 
Yup Wolf, Gold Lion are making real good tubes, and they are reasonably priced. Still have to match them, of course. RAM Tubes is great at that.