2. analog
  3. 140184-113812

Turntable got absolutely crushed by CD

Long story short, i've just brought home a VPI classic 1 mounted with a Zu-Denon DL103 on JMW Memorial 10.5 with the appropriate heavier counterweight. Had everything dialed in..perfect azimuth, VTF, overhang, with only a slightly higher than perfect VTA. Levelling checked. All good. 

I did a comparison between the VPI and my Esoteric X03SE and it's not even close. The Esoteric completely crushes the VPI in all regards. The level of treble refinement, air, decay, soundstage depth and width, seperation, tonality, overall coherence is just a simply a league above from what I'm hearing from the VPI. The only area the VPI seems to be better at is bass weight, but not by much. 

I'm honestly quite dumbfounded here. I've always believed that analogue should be superior to digital. I know the Esoteric is a much pricier item but the VPI classic is supposed to be a very good turntable and shouldn't be a slouch either. At this point I feel like I should give up on analogue playback and invest further in digital. 

Has anyone had a similar experience comparing the best of digital to a very good analogue setup?

Equipment:
Esoteric X03SE 
VPI Classic, JMW Memorial 10.5, Zu-DL103
Accuphase C200L
Accuphase P600
AR 90 speakers

Test Record/CD:
Sarah McLachlan - Surfacing (Redbook vs MOV 180g reissue)



chadsort
mahler123
3,313 posts
 
I sold off my vinyl rig a couple of years ago.  I had gotten back into vinyl around the year 2000, out of nostalgia for shopping for lps, album covers, and also at that time there were several favorite albums of mine (my lp collection had been destroyed in a flood at dawn of the CD era) that had not yet been digitalized.  After 15 years , several upgrades of turntables, cartridges and pre amps, the fun had gone out of the hobby.  By then all my albums were available digitally, and in every case smoked the lps.  I am glad that vinyl is perceived as such a great media because I got a great deal when I sold my analog rig.
  I can only shake my head at the list of suggestions given here to try and improve analog front ends.  At least it keeps people busy...
dynaquest4's avatar
dynaquest4
445 posts
 
Forum user above made the following statement about another user.  In part:
...made by user "cleeds" who is like a festering, infected boil upon this forum he is ignorant, misinformed....
This name calling is not only sophomoric, it is demeaning and inflammatory while serving no legitimate literary purpose.  Lets see if we all can, while perhaps having opposing views, keep our emotions in check and discuss this subject like adults.
glupson
7,842 posts
 
"...based on the best, most reliable, researched data that I have does not even own a music reproduction system!"

This appears to be a case of stalking, stalking, and stalking.
glupson
7,842 posts
 
dynaquest4,

You are right but do not get too upset about this. cleeds seems to attract some negative energy and, despite frequently disagreeing with her/his views, I do not think it is deserved. This "infected boil" thing was mentioned in the past with humorous responses by other posters. It is obviously something else at play than just disagreement or personal animosity.

clearthink does deserve a praise for consistency, effort, and thoroughness. It is not easy, practical, and convenient never to miss mentioning three things in a row in each sentence, thought, or description. It does seem like a part of a bigger problem, unusual presentation, or stronger feelings, and not only bad manners, unacceptable behavior, and lack of anything meaningful to say. Huh, this was not easy.
prof
3,473 posts
 
glupson,

Yes, there certainly are some ironically named users on this site ;-)

Whereas Cleeds’ info was good, and presented fairly and with civility.
More to discover