A Question About Volume Controls Types

I have one more question if you don’t mind; are there any advantages with one type of volume control over the other?

Well, with the regular type volume control, it's probably a potentiometer which is basically a variable resistor and typically these continuously contact a resistive plate, which can wear out and become statick-y over time. The other type is a stepped attenuator, with discrete contact positions which attenuate the signal using a set of resistors. These contacts are discrete steps so at any position the knob is connected to two contacts, one at the input...then the signal passing through a set of resistors, and going to the output contact position. The possibility of wear and tear is less.

Maybe somebody else can tell if there's an advantage with one type of volume control over another?

Digitally controlled controls often employ a chip that does the actual volume control change. Because of that the resistive elements often are not to the same quality as an analog control. I feel that analog controls are the best way to go and are better than digitally controlled and all-digital volume systems. But analog controls vary widely too; the best are actually switches with fixed resistors as mentioned above.

I've always liked the tactile feel of a knob vs. push buttons ...  my last preamp had digial volume...I hated it and regretted selling my Mc C15 for that unit.

My c-j Classic 2SE has an analog pot, no remote which is fine by me.  My NAD M51 has a digital volume control, and honestly it is one of the best I have ever heard and is super smooth and has fi e increments, 100 steps.  

So it doesn't matter how its done as long as its done well.  

Thanks for all the help Guys!