Morrow IC's

Is it me or should Morrow should change their name to “break in” cables. Every thread for the past 7 or 8 years talk about this long tedious break in. Who wants to do that? Really. One should plug and play. A little opening up should be expected. However, one should not pay and then have to go thru a space shuttle procedure checklist for weeks before enjoying. In one thread, people were actually talking about the burn in reverses if not played a while. Others saying you should “re burn in” when moving cable to a different component.

Listening to music should not be this difficult

With all due respect to @dorkwad's comments above, most of which I agreed with,  I used to have Morrow MA4's and were pretty happy with them.  However I bought some Teo GC's - tempted by the promise of amazing performance - and spent about 400 hours burning those in.  They sounded distinctly worse than the Morrows so I eventually sent them back and put the Morrows back in.

If balanced interconnects are on your mind, let me know.

@aberyclark one common theme from peoples experiences with these cables is that they sound good right away, and then they seem to sound better later on. The later on part may be our imaginations, or our brains getting used to their particular signature, but I think it’s the initial impression that is most important. If you’re curious buy a set and try them - if you hate the sound out of the box then send them right back - they won’t change so much that they become different cables IME.