No one has provided a logical, technical counterpoint to kosst's argument regarding class D other than experiential vignettes.
No one has proven the measurements Kosst has alluded to are audible on the other side of a speaker.
All Kosst has done is noticed 1 measurement.
There are plenty of ways in which Class D is as good or better than many SS and Tube Class A, Class A/B amps.
Noise and frequency response and low output impedance in the audible band among them. Why don't we count those 3 as better than Kosst's single measurement?
Why do you think Stereophile uses an output filter in the first place? Because it is more meaningful that way. What makes Kosst such an authority that he can disregard it? Puhleese.