Why not horns?


I've owned a lot of speakers over the years but I have never experienced anything like the midrange reproduction from my horns. With a frequency response of 300 Hz. up to 14 Khz. from a single distortionless driver, it seems like a no-brainer that everyone would want this performance. Why don't you use horns?
macrojack
Many people today are unable to differentiate between what they actually know and what they have chosen to believe. Experience draws a bright line between these two opposites.
Horns are music and instrument selective. No speakers can reproduce the sound of a sax better than a horn. All speakers are music selective to some degree.
"Horns have unexploited potential. Lets get busy harvesting their potential. Most other options seem to have reached their limits long ago"

Well said and I agree 100%. I will add that the progression of horn technology is the single best hope for getting closer to the dynamics of the live music experience. Lot's of problems getting it right as outlined above including the small market. This technology is not getting R&D funds of the larger speaker manufacturers and is progressing on the backs of a few dedicated small companies and the DIY enthusiasts.

Herman, The tweeters a horn Fostex t500amk2 , mids horn, midbass horn and the bass system is a 8ft tall back loaded bass horn. If you want full front loading of bass into infra sound as this horn does it would be 25ft l by 25 w.
Horns were the dominant speaker technology for many years, probably due to the unavailability of reasonably priced high out-put amplification. Once reasonably priced high-out-put amplification became available, horns became less popular. Now that there has been a resurgence in the popularity of low powered amplification, the popularity of horns has increased. IMHO, the recent popularity of horns has more to do with accommodating certain amplification choices, than with any inherent superiority horns might have unto themselves.