Why not horns?


I've owned a lot of speakers over the years but I have never experienced anything like the midrange reproduction from my horns. With a frequency response of 300 Hz. up to 14 Khz. from a single distortionless driver, it seems like a no-brainer that everyone would want this performance. Why don't you use horns?
macrojack
Almarg...... upon consideration I'm convinced you are correct.

All three of my examples have listed specs of 26dB gain. This equates to 400W, correct? (under ideal circumstances)
Yet the other specs are listed as 150W and 300W. The maximum wattage is not specified for paralleling the largest amp (VK-600m) So we can probably assume that it tops out at 400W maximum (still 26dB gain) with overkill ability on the current side.
All they are doing is adding more power supply and more heat dissipation.

Thanks again for your contribution. This probably wasn't the best example to illustrate my original point. ugh! haha.
Unsound is right.

Don't be a horn Nazi! Sharing of different views (that's all they are) by all including those who loathe horns is part of the learning experience. Just stick to the facts and I'm sure that horns will find some new devotees which is the best that can be hoped for realistically with any technology or approach discussed on this site.
"Horn Nazis"? Well, even the Nazis did some things well (roads for example) but that doesn't justify their other deeds. As I have said, horns do Dixieland jazz superbly, but I can't listen to Dixieland all the time.
I'm glad I gave up my audiophile card long ago, because thats when music became fun again. My Apogee dipole panel speakers are fun to listen to, and so are my horns (Klipsch).

My Bose 901's out in the garage are also fun....and so are my big old ugly VMPS Supertower/R's.

When I was an audiophile, I rarely found music or speakers that were fun, and once the fun was gone......so was I.

After around 5 years I came back for another try, and with a new goal......."Don't worry, be Happy"....and have fun!

Dave
Al, I too was unfamiliar with the design of the circuit, but one does not have to know anything about it to know that it is impossible to get more power without more voltage.

Some are assuming that paralleled output tubes will somehow would drive more current into the load when we both know that for a given load the amount of current delivered is a function of voltage. These are voltage source amps, not current sources. I tried to explain this and as a result received an email telling me I was insolent, a complete and utter fool, and a coward.

So my interest was piqued and I sent an email to BAT. I figured maybe they used a higher tap on the secondary of the power transformer to get B+ up a bit. Close, but wrong. They do parallel the channels but as I've proven that does not raise the voltage. They also use a higher tap on the output transformer to raise the voltage. Very clever.

So for those who thought me to be an utter fool for saying you must raise the voltage, well, I guess we know who looks foolish now. Now that we have that settled I'll let the horn haters bash it out with the horn lovers.

Interesting thread, learned a bit about conical horns.

Oh, and distortions do not average out.

.