Why not horns?


I've owned a lot of speakers over the years but I have never experienced anything like the midrange reproduction from my horns. With a frequency response of 300 Hz. up to 14 Khz. from a single distortionless driver, it seems like a no-brainer that everyone would want this performance. Why don't you use horns?
macrojack
Hello Larsfool,

Thanks for the post , Audiophiles listen to recordings of live music and not live music itself , a completely different experience from a musician..

The cello can only sound at it's best like a recording of a live cello and again i iterate.....

I can safely say the musician comment is not uncommon , well at least for my experience, I'm sure there are many other speaker companies with musicians making the same claim, that was my point, it is not unusual for manufactures to make that claim , that in itself does not guarantee a checkered flag...

regards
Macrobaby,

Your ignorance and poor reading comprehensions makes it difficult to communicate with you, not everyone will have your Borg like acceptance and mentality. ...

G'day!
Hello Learsfool,

My comments was not meant to be derogatory to musicians. Worked with and for many in the past, My comments were nothing more than to differentiate the experience between audiophile and musician ...

The recorded medium ...

Regards
macro,

You're starting to sound a bit like a broken record and a bit "shouty" like some horns as well.

Also, everyone knows the Borg have no need for speakers or acoustics in general, much less horns to communicate their musical information patterns. So Borg like, maybe, but not Borg for sure.
Macro, you seem to be all shot in the butt with "experts." Why should I believe Bill Woods web site any more than I believe other horn maker's web sites. He says his way is best. DUH! What would you expect him to say. If you visit other horn maker's sites they will say their way is best. Go to a planar web site and find out why that approach is the best. Go to a box maker's site and find out why that approach is the best. You aren't going to convince anybody by posting over and over that if we would just visit his site we would find the truth about the holy grail.

Bill Woods web site is nothing more than a big advertisement for his products which is as it should be. That's not a bad thing but accepting his hyperbole as fact just because he is an "expert" and tells us how wonderful his products are is rather silly.

.