Why not horns?

Poor Bill Woods. All those years of research, study and experimentation resulted in a horn that could easily be improved by consulting the posters right here on Audiogon.

I have posted links to his website several times now that would answer your questions. If you are sincere in wanting to know about his horns, you can get most of the info you are asking about right there.

Perhaps if you understood Bill's true stature in the pantheon of speaker designers, you would show more respect. You might even learn something.
I have.

Hello Larsfool,

Thanks for the post , Audiophiles listen to recordings of live music and not live music itself , a completely different experience from a musician..

The cello can only sound at it's best like a recording of a live cello and again i iterate.....

I can safely say the musician comment is not uncommon , well at least for my experience, I'm sure there are many other speaker companies with musicians making the same claim, that was my point, it is not unusual for manufactures to make that claim , that in itself does not guarantee a checkered flag...

regards

Macrobaby,

Your ignorance and poor reading comprehensions makes it difficult to communicate with you, not everyone will have your Borg like acceptance and mentality. ...

G'day!

Hello Learsfool,

My comments was not meant to be derogatory to musicians. Worked with and for many in the past, My comments were nothing more than to differentiate the experience between audiophile and musician ...

The recorded medium ...

Regards

macro,

You're starting to sound a bit like a broken record and a bit "shouty" like some horns as well.

Also, everyone knows the Borg have no need for speakers or acoustics in general, much less horns to communicate their musical information patterns. So Borg like, maybe, but not Borg for sure.