An encounter and lesson in speaker prices ...


Not to long ago, in a shop I like but will remain nameless I got to observe a customer evaluate a pair of systems side by side. The buyer had an eastern European accent. First they listened to the larger system, $50k speakers, equivalently priced amps and digital.


It sounded _really_ good. Then we moved to another system. Slightly smaller speaker pair, around $20k, completely different DAC and amp. Sounded like crap. The digititis was unbearable and the speakers were clearly out of phase. On top of that, the treble and bass balance were now all wrong.


The buyer was "I like them, what colors do they com in? " and that was that.

After the buyer left I looked behind at the amp. Yep, I was right, the pahse was reversed. The darkness of the room and angle made this an easy and common mistake to make. But the rest was unbearable.


What is my point? The people buying the top end gear are not necessarily the one’s with decent ears, so we really cannot trust price points to be any sort of guide to value. If you develop your taste on your own, independent of prices, you can score some fabulously performing gear at a fraction of what this buyer was going to end up with.


Best,

E
erik_squires
They probably s&$t themselves laughing when he choose the ones they rigged. 
How do we know the lower priced speakers were out of phase?  Unless you know whether each piece of equipment in each system isingerting or non-inverting, you don’t.  It’s possible that one system was inverted at the speaker outputs compared to the other system, and speaker cables on the lower priced system were reversed to correct that.   
Hi @tarheelneil
I meant the speakers were out of phase relatively to left and right.
If all the statements about one system being so much better than the other one are true, could it have something to do with the difference in price? From what we know, better-sounding system was more than twice the price. Maybe, price does mean something.

Often, hearing "good" is good and then hearing "better" is noticeably better. However, going back from "better" to "good" in a short time may give an impression of a much bigger difference. Which seems to have been a timeline here.