Millercarbon wrote: "Hard to overstate how disappointed I am that so few people are interested."
The following is just my guess:
One of the things that is an awful lot of fun about high-end audio is, pride of ownership in a piece of equipment that has astonishing and enthralling characteristics. In a subwoofer, "astonishing and enthralling characteristics" usually have to do with how powerful it is, how deep it goes, how much air it moves, and how impressively it renders highly challenging program material such as cannon shots, pipe organ, depth charges, and dinosaur footfalls. That stuff is as engaging and entertaining as understanding and appreciating what’s under the hood of a sports car and how it translates into raw, adrenaline-jolt performance.
With a distributed multi-sub system, your budget is spread across (typically) four subwoofers, so the individual subwoofers will fall well short of what you could have in a single sub for the same price. It’s like you can have four Toyotas or one Lamborghini. And it is not at all obvious that those four Toyotas used properly might be able to do something really cool, something even better than that one Lamborghini.
The IDEA that four (relatively) small subs can successfully address what is arguably the most important issue (room interaction) rather elegantly is competing against far more widely-accepted, and frankly far more self-evident, ideas about "what really matters" in a subwoofer system. Thank you for helping it to do so.
Duke