Is it common for tubes to outweigh the cost of the amp or preamp?


I just got my first tube (headphone) amp and was wondering if it is common to spend more on the tubes than the actual cost of the amp. The amp was $599 with stock tubes. I just ordered NOS driver tubes that ran $640 for the pair and the power tube upgrade I'm planning will be another $300. That has the tubes sitting at 1.5 times the cost of the amp itself.

I don't find the total of $1539 for the amp and upgraded tubes unreasonable but considering the next model (amp) up is $1199, it has me wondering what would be better... a lower cost amp with superior tubes or a higher cost amp with stock tubes?
samiamnot
you can't go wrong with vintage tubes from the US or from Europe; even 80's era East European tubes are far superior to what is coming from China and Russia, which is what you find typically in even high end gear. Maybe the best way to describe vintage tubes is to look upon it like cooking; an old family recipe or institutional fare. 
Post removed 
One way to save a few $$ is to buy ugly tubes and pairs and quads that were all manufactured the same but we're labeled for various companies.Sometimes a couple of new production tubes alongside of a couple of NOS sounds good too.
I don’t know about that but I did spend more on Herbies Tube Dampers than I did on tubes. 
samiamnot-

No insult intended with my post. 

The intention was to raise awareness  that perhaps one might consider  starting with a substantial "box" before additional expense-especially if it exceeds the value of the actual box.

I use tubes in my system-amp,tuner and phono. Using NOS tubes that cost more than the equipment, won't ensure anything. Since it's a headphone amp, I would be more concerned using QUIET tubes. 

If you do find it improves your experience, that's all that matters. It's all subjective, YMMV and all that.

Considering tubes that cost more than the equipment, would be a reason to reevaluate my original purchase, and perhaps upgrade to a better unit.