Is a Bryston 3B SST2 enough for Magnepan 3.7i or 20.7?


Hello,

I currently have a Bryston 3B SST2 with BP26 Preamp.  My current speakers are Magnepan .7s with a small KEF sub.  I love the combination but am getting the upgrade bug.  

I'm just not sure the 3B SST2 has enough power to drive the 3.7i's or even the 20.7s well.  I do not listen at very high volume levels, as a good deal of my listening is late at night after everyone else is asleep.  That is another concern is that will the amp drive them well at very low volume?  Not sure I would need the sub with the 3.7s or 20.7s.

Appreciate any thoughts from Bryston and Maggie owners.

Thanks,

GK



grekon39
Al
Thanks a bunch for all the info, I'm pretty sure I got them...
And you are correct on the last point, it was a typo on my part.
All the Best


So you have a very inefficient speaker with a low ohm loading on the amplifier. I believe that many amplifiers distortion profiles change for the worse as they get driving low ohm loads, it requires a stiff power supply or a switch mode power supply. Maggie's are awesome though in every sense when properly driven, and properly placed in the room, pulled significantly away from reflecting surfaces as bass waves will screw with them. THEY CAN IMAGE LIKE CRAZY! Good luck!
Random memory trace just surfaced. 

I used the Bryston 3B SST on one pair of Tympani II, I believe it was, and a 4B SST on another pair of Tympanis, running in parallel. Could not tell the difference at moderate listening levels.
Anthem's PVA 2 is comparable to the Bryston, but still not really what you want to run the Maggies.  I would say step up to Anthem's MCA225 $1999 Retail 225w x 2.  More power and more open sounding than comparable Bryston's.  Bigger money - go to the Anthem P2 $4500 325w x 2.  
OK, I’ve read this thread and here are my thoughts, simple as they may be. A 100W capable amp and a 200W capable amp will output the same amount of bass at the same wattage. Notice I have used the word "capable," as it is the "maximum" wattage the amp is claimed to produce. If each amp is putting out 25W at a particular point, then the bass output would be the same.

Now, the capability issue comes into play generally with musical peaks, and/or low sensitivity or low impedance speakers ... it is in this area where wattage capability becomes important. A 200W amp will better address those issues than a 100W amp, and will provide more headroom when and if needed. Is a 200W amp preferable to a 100W amp? It depends on several factors. However, if one listens at low levels mostly, then the difference in wattage becomes somewhat negligible.

Nonetheless, I agree with both propositions that: (a) amps outputting the same amount of wattage at a given point in time will output the same amount of bass; and (b) a larger, more powerful amp generally will provide better control of a speaker IF the additional wattage is necessary for musical peaks (i.e., high volume listening), a speaker with low sensitivity, or a speaker which is not stable into a relatively normal impedance (i.e., 8 Ohms). Them’s my thoughts, no flaming, please.