Big +1 @erik_squires and well said. You could give me and Mario Battali the same ingredients to make a bolognese sauce, but does anyone think they'd prefer mine? Ha! Would you pay more for Mario's sauce? I know I would if I really want to enjoy my dinner at a high level.
You're paying for knowledge, expertise, development time and costs, manufacturing labor, shipping, warranty, and the final results of all of this. Like Erik said, the market will be the the fair and final arbiter of price and the success of the product. As far the Pulsars, given their popularity and positive reviews, I think it's hard to make the case it's overpriced. Also, Silverline's newest version of the SR17 is a similar product in that it uses premium drivers, a well-designed crossover, and a nice cabinet. And guess what? It's priced right in the same range as the Pulsars. That, to me, is indicative of a competitive market at work and fair pricing. Also, you have to factor in that companies like these are small, boutique manufactures and sell in much smaller numbers than the big guys, so their costs per unit are naturally going to be higher. But they still have to compete with the big guys so they're still limited at how much they can charge.
The only caveat I'd say is the direct-sale model where the dealer markup can be avoided. Yes you could potentially get more value buying this way -- assuming you can find a speaker you really like -- which is tough because there's nowhere to hear them. But that's a different business model and has downsides of its own.
Some of you seem to be implying some of these speaker manufacturers price their products agregiously and at whatever they want like they're monopolists. The competitive market would weed this behavior out rather quickly. And I highly doubt Jeff Joseph and Alan Yun are driving around in Ferraris -- that'd be the cable manufacturers. Save your ire for them.
You're paying for knowledge, expertise, development time and costs, manufacturing labor, shipping, warranty, and the final results of all of this. Like Erik said, the market will be the the fair and final arbiter of price and the success of the product. As far the Pulsars, given their popularity and positive reviews, I think it's hard to make the case it's overpriced. Also, Silverline's newest version of the SR17 is a similar product in that it uses premium drivers, a well-designed crossover, and a nice cabinet. And guess what? It's priced right in the same range as the Pulsars. That, to me, is indicative of a competitive market at work and fair pricing. Also, you have to factor in that companies like these are small, boutique manufactures and sell in much smaller numbers than the big guys, so their costs per unit are naturally going to be higher. But they still have to compete with the big guys so they're still limited at how much they can charge.
The only caveat I'd say is the direct-sale model where the dealer markup can be avoided. Yes you could potentially get more value buying this way -- assuming you can find a speaker you really like -- which is tough because there's nowhere to hear them. But that's a different business model and has downsides of its own.
Some of you seem to be implying some of these speaker manufacturers price their products agregiously and at whatever they want like they're monopolists. The competitive market would weed this behavior out rather quickly. And I highly doubt Jeff Joseph and Alan Yun are driving around in Ferraris -- that'd be the cable manufacturers. Save your ire for them.