TA-102 fo.Q Product from Japan "TRY These"

Ozzy, please post your results on your 7000. One of the biggest improvement in audio for me has been power related.

I grew up using mortite, and since it's introduction, use Dynamat as a dampening material ( speaker horns, speaker frames, speaker boxes, tt platters, component chassis’s, etc., with great success, and improved sq). Would this tape be as effective, less or more so, than the Dynamat product ? I have also used roofing repair tape. And in place of AVM ( anti vibration magic ), as it was ridiculously expensive when it was available, I have used DAP Dynaflex 230 silicone sealant ( the one that does not harden ) on capacitors and crossovers, with again, excellence in improved sq. You can use others, like GE, but DAP is more economical. Thank you. And, for the 1 or 2 naysayers ( jkbtn ), I simply ignore you folks. Enjoy ! MrD.

mrdecibel - 
I have not compared fo.Q with any of the materials you mentioned. However in theory, the fo.Q should be more effective than any of them, for the reasons I have already stated earlier in this thread.

Whenever and wherever I use fo.Q, it has always provided a better improvement than I expected. I can't even think of any time I used it, when the result was not good.

Correction - I have compared it with AVM. - fo.Q works much better and produces subjectively similar results, but AVM had the benefit of being non-conductive and therefore excellent for use on circuit boards. fo.Q has the benefit of being removable.

Has anyone used the TA-102 fo.Q on glass windows? I was wondering if these could substitute for the pricier Marigo Dots.