Ayre Codex vs. Lampizator Amber II


I am using the Ayre Codex as a stand-alone dac in my 2 channel system right now, and it sounds great.  I am now interested in the Lampizator Amber II dac and wondering how both dacs compare in terms of sound quality.  Has anyone ever heard of both dacs?  Thanks.
respected_ent
Codex measurements are awful. Probabably is not necessary to spend that much to upgrade.


The Codex measure very very very closely to the Pono in Stereophile, and the Pono was one of, if not THE best sounding portable I’ve ever heard, especially with IEM’s. This makes me think that there's no relationship to the numbers AND that Ayre reused the design practically lock stock and barrel.


ASR’s entire process is deeply flawed. It isn’t science, it is quality assurance. The Oppo though, also measured poorly and man, I hated it from first listen. So, their measurements have no correlation to user experience. If you want to listen the way a scope does though, follow them.


To actually review these DACs scientifically they need to listen first, or independently before measuring, otherwise it is just confirmation bias.


Best,
E
I have a Ayre Codex in my system, and it appears to be one of the best purchases I ever made. Got a used one about 2 years ago at a bargain basement price and it is still going strong with no issues. Buying a new one at regular price is a good value, but a good used one at a discount is a "no-brainer."
I heard the Codex at Audioconnection and ended up getting two used ones (Sorry, Johnny). 
Like mr_m, one of my better purchases.
I'd be curious as to how the Lampizator stacks up to the Codex- 
And, the Brooklyn DAC, too.
I also own a Schiit Gungnir, and it comes pretty close to the Codex.
Bob
I too, am curious about Lampizator. Have heard many fine things about them.
Hey Bob, I've been getting thoughts about buying a second used Codex too!!!