'Unlistenable' early digital recordings?


Obviously, today’s engineering of digital masters is far superior than the early years. Some say that many CD’s from the early years are ’unlistenable’. I used to agree. But, over the past couple of years, I’ve spent considerable effort to clean up the power to each of my digital components. Now, early CD’s are quite listenable. They might not be ’audiophile quality’ but the music comes across just fine. No more digital nasties. No more glare or etch in the HF. No more excessive boominess in the LF. I’m definitely a clean power convert. So much so, that I recommend cleaning up the power before upgrading to a new DAC. What’s your experience?

steakster
viridian:

 "Who cares about sound quality?"

     Gee, viridian, I don't know.  Perhaps every single member on this site except you!
     What planet are you from?

Tim


Music lovers don't let an appreciation for good sound get in their way.    They just try to make the best of each recording.  It's not rocket science!
Post removed 
@steakster,
Great topic. I recently figured out how to use an old Blue Circle Thingee as a standalone device instead of using it in line and once that AC was cleaned up, everything sounded better.

Old CDs that were just too soft, ECM CDs that were too polite, and the like, all sound rather good, if not outstanding (ECM). I didn't realize how bad the noise was on my AC.

All the best,
Nonoise