Few months ago I decided to change my amp and I auditioned one class D (Devialet expert pro 1000) and one pure class A (MBL M204 mono blocks) head to head in my home system. My initial strong preference was towards the Devialet as it looks gorgeous (especially that remote), has tons of features, takes almost no space and although quite expensive was still below the MBLs price tag. Unfortunately the head-to-head was a revealing exercise - I am still not sure whether the Devialet was not as good as advertised or the MBLs were just to amazing, but the difference was obvious and not in favor of class D in that very case. After the first Wow effect of the Devialet I started to realize that I miss the sweetness of the music, it was kind of everything is there, but cannot touch you. MBLs produced much more refined and enjoyable sound with every kind of music, especially jazz. So I ended up with two huge heavenly sounding monster heaters in my room. Next time I hope to find a more convincing class D amp :)
I went from Class D to Luxman A/AB - And most of what you think is wrong
Hi everyone,
As most of you know, I’m a fan of Class D. I have lived with ICEPower 250AS based amps for a couple of years. Before that I lived with a pair of Parasound A21s (for HT) and now I’m listening to a Luxman 507ux.
I have some thoughts after long term listening:
I found the Class D a touch warm, powerful, noise free. Blindfolded I cannot tell them apart from the Parasound A21s which are completely linear, and run a touch warm due to high Class A operation, and VERY similar in power output.
The Luxman 507 beats them both, but no amp stands out as nasty sounding or lacking in the ability to be musical and involving.
What the Luxman 507 does better is in the midrange and ends of the spectrum. It is less dark, sweeter in the midrange, and sounds more powerful, almost "louder" in the sense of having more treble and bass. It IS a better amplifier than I had before. Imaging is about the same.
There was one significant operational difference, which others have confirmed. I don't know why this is true, but the Class D amps needed 2-4 days to warm up. The Luxman needs no time at all. I have no rational, engineering explanation for this. After leaving the ICEPower amps off for a weekend, they sounded pretty low fi. Took 2 days to come back. I can come home after work and turn the Luxman on and it sounds great from the first moment.
Please keep this in mind when evaluating.
Best,
E
As most of you know, I’m a fan of Class D. I have lived with ICEPower 250AS based amps for a couple of years. Before that I lived with a pair of Parasound A21s (for HT) and now I’m listening to a Luxman 507ux.
I have some thoughts after long term listening:
- The tropes of Class D having particularly bad, noticeable Class D qualities are all wrong and have been for years.
- No one has ever heard my Class D amps and gone: "Oh, wow, Class D, that’s why I hate it."
- The Luxman is a better amp than my ICEPower modules, which are already pretty old.
I found the Class D a touch warm, powerful, noise free. Blindfolded I cannot tell them apart from the Parasound A21s which are completely linear, and run a touch warm due to high Class A operation, and VERY similar in power output.
The Luxman 507 beats them both, but no amp stands out as nasty sounding or lacking in the ability to be musical and involving.
What the Luxman 507 does better is in the midrange and ends of the spectrum. It is less dark, sweeter in the midrange, and sounds more powerful, almost "louder" in the sense of having more treble and bass. It IS a better amplifier than I had before. Imaging is about the same.
There was one significant operational difference, which others have confirmed. I don't know why this is true, but the Class D amps needed 2-4 days to warm up. The Luxman needs no time at all. I have no rational, engineering explanation for this. After leaving the ICEPower amps off for a weekend, they sounded pretty low fi. Took 2 days to come back. I can come home after work and turn the Luxman on and it sounds great from the first moment.
Please keep this in mind when evaluating.
Best,
E
- ...
- 297 posts total
bigkidz, The Merrill Veritas mono-blocks at about $10K/pair are one of the best class D monos currently available. They also just introduced some even more expensive monos that use the very fast switching and new GaN transistors instead of the traditional FETs. These are the Element 114, 116 and 118 models that are starting to get rave reviews but are expensive, with the Element 114 priced at $15K/pair. I don't consider these reasonably priced but I'm not sure of your budget. If you'd like some very good class D amps reasonably priced, I'd suggest considering amps from D-Sonic. They offer very good stereo and mono-block amps with even their top models priced well under $3K. I've owned their older model M3-600-M monos for about 4yrs and they are extremely good powering my Magnepans. The latest model of these are the M3a-600-M priced at $2,150/pair and the top of the line monos are the M3a-1500-M priced at $2,750/pair. They also offer stereo amps for even less. Here's their website: ://www.d-sonic.com/amplifiers I'd suggest calling and discussing with the owner, Dennis Deacon, which amps would be the best fit for your Vandersteen 5As. A 30-day trial period is offered on all their amps. |
I have supported a certain type of database technology for most of my career. Good product. But about 25 years ago they came out with a very bad version of the product and then a bit slow to rectify the situation along with a few other issues. There were some very large companies that this impacted greatly. The software company quickly got things lined out but the bad press took many many years to overcome and in some ways was really never completely shed. Can't argue though that stereotyping is a real time saver. I like my little PS Audio S 300. And I agree, I think it do sound better after being left powered on. |
- 297 posts total