Nandric
How about a EMT 950 ?
Thank you
Peter
How about a EMT 950 ?
Thank you
Peter
Why will no other turntable beat the EMT 927?
Bear in mind that the BBC used to employ the highly regarded idler drive Gates turntable before switching to the Technics SP10. The Technics was seen as more reliable and maintenance free but I don’t recall anyone saying it sounded better than the Gates. Yes, these new recent Technics decks improve the phenomenal specs (speed stability and rumble etc) even further into the realm of Sci-Fi but perhaps turntable design was as already good as it ever needed to be by 1970! Perhaps someone could do an original SP10 v new SP10 to confirm this? Or perhaps there’s no need! Anyway let’s not forget that many of the so-called audiophile decks that followed couldn’t get anywhere near to the specs achieved by the Technics and a few others. *Here's a link to an interesting review of an SP10 mk2 by none other than British DJ Kenny Everett from Studio Sound dated September 1977! https://www.americanradiohistory.com/Studio-Sound.htm (<9mb PDF Studio Sound September 1977) |
Most my age have heard the SP-10...many times. No one will ever argue that it isn’t a fine table, but it will never deliver the Pace-Pitch-Power of a 927. Even the lesser Duals, Garrard, and Lencos with idler drive display this quality. But when you’re talking about broadcast built tables, EMT , Gates and Russco Studio can’t be matched. Honestly, everything about the table, from the actuation of the speed selectors, to the feel of the spinning platter let you know that what you are using is something very special. It’s such and impressive machine. Then there is the music, you never knew you vinyl could convey such emotion. Even with modest tone arms and cartridges the results are stellar. N. |