@ericsch I’m using a DOGE Audio DAC 7. It has taken first place over my NAD Masters M51. I just couldn’t see dropping $5k on a DAC when the technology has changed so very much in the last decade.
SACD Player--Do you use it and feel you'd replace it if it broke?
I've always been curious about SACD. For many years I was near 50% cd and 50% vinyl in my listening. I ditched CDs and went all vinyl for awhile. In the last 2 years I have upped my digital game with a great tube DAC and enjoy Tidal quite a bit. As I now have better sounding digital I've wondered if my previous bias slightly against digital clouded my view of SACD.
I'm thinking that if I bought one and had 10-15 killer SACDs I would feel it worth it. This would require the SACDs to be of great music I love and also offer something special sonically.
And now, THE Question: What can you tell me about your SACD use and would you replace the player if it broke or was otherwise out of commission?
Thank you so very much. This forum makes it possible to get intel like this without knowing a living soul using SACD that I could have a beer (or two :) and learn more from a firsthand user.
I'm thinking that if I bought one and had 10-15 killer SACDs I would feel it worth it. This would require the SACDs to be of great music I love and also offer something special sonically.
And now, THE Question: What can you tell me about your SACD use and would you replace the player if it broke or was otherwise out of commission?
Thank you so very much. This forum makes it possible to get intel like this without knowing a living soul using SACD that I could have a beer (or two :) and learn more from a firsthand user.
- ...
- 36 posts total
I was excited to get a highly regarded Oppo for blu ray and SACD, bought some SACDs, especially a series of Oscar Peterson's 'for my friends'. (wonderful in any format!). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusively_for_My_Friends What's the difference between CD and SACD? My take is the noise floor is lower, the music comes from 'liquid black' if that makes any sense. Michael Jackson, .... some other excellent recordings to begin with, that is my simple summation. Is such quiet natural? Is listening for a difference distracting? Is it as involving? In either case, as with all digital, I think digital does not get the overtones 'as right' as analog does, also my simple summation of why I prefer analog (and tubes). I decided not to bother with the SACD versions. I listen to a lot of vinyl and R2R tapes, the noise floor is nowhere as low as SACD, but both Analog formats are more involving than either CD or SACD. I still enjoy my CD's, but nearly always go to vinyl or R2R for fully immersive music, and those have been culled for excellent recording quality as well as primary artist and musician's talents and of course the specific selections. Younger people listen differently than my generation. I am 71, we learned to listen to radio singles and whole albums at home. R2R and Vinyl, I listen to the whole album, in the order that was selected for presentation. CD's, not often, but frequently, I select which tracks. I had a programmable turntable (linear tracking for that). I used it to make tapes of selected tracks, that was great, but when listening to the album, I listened to the whole album as usual. Of course, it wasn't the highest quality, so I reverted to my Thorens/SME/ShureMR and gave the tracking TT to my friend. The problem with R2R is the format/pre-recorded content stopped, so my most involving format is limited by content. |
- 36 posts total