What about a cable that is so different that it requires a magnitude different layer of physics to describe it? (QED vs LCR)
Would that bring perspective in and about wire, and what it (wire) actually sounds like, for the first time?
After all, all those frozen lattices are the same, re their transmission behavior. Carbon fiber, graphite, graphene, silver, gold, copper, alloys, all the dielectrics and everything in between... ---all the same.
The only actual and true difference available, is the liquid metal conductor. That’s it.
Everything you know and are immersed in live as and by..and thus cannot find a difference to be able to orient yourself.....and liquid metal as the only ’other’ choice.
The only one that can offer actual perspective (parallax view for the first time) on the idea of really finding out what wire does in an audio system, what wire makes things sound like.
One can hear differences in wire, but one cannot actually escape wire (all the lattice solids in the gear, the whole shebang) to be outside of godel’s incompleteness theorem (as applied to audio) and actually gain a fundamental point of perspective, to gain a critical point of knowing.
Liquid metal audio cable offers that new perspective.
