Interconnects and Speaker Cable, What in your history hit your pleasure button?


Many of us have had several sets of interconnects and speaker cables.  I have had many of the brands associated with at one time or another of being SOTA.

The ones that I remember having the most aural and mental impact on my pleasure index were the Wireworld Gold Eclipse.  I am not endorsing the Copper vs. Silver debate or forgetting the Nordost, Kimber and many other brands I have owned, I just remember the Gold Eclipse as being a major listening pleasure. 

And you?

whatjd
Silver conductors have been hitting my pleasure button, since they started using it in cables.   Even so; it's been interesting, how information can still be lost, even with some, "better" cables.  ie: After some reading on the Wireworld Platinum Eclipse 7 interconnects, I thought I’d try a pair, to upgrade from Silver Audio Hyacinths(a few years back) . I’d enjoyed those(feeding my main amps), for almost a decade, by then. More defined(I could listen further into the mix), but- my sound stage narrowed, by about 5-6’. Before sending the audition pair back to The Cable Company(to allow further comparison), I ordered Synergistic’s Tesla Apex interconnects(their best, below bank-breaking, then). The same beautiful rendition as the Eclipse pair, BUT- my sound stage was back, in all it’s spaciousness.    A big +1, for Michael Spallone's MPC mod(worked for me too).     I did try Wireworld's Gold Eclipse 7s, between my TacT RCS 2.2X and Bass amp.  They're still there.  
I strongly suspect the “trick” with silver cables is a combination or all of the following,

wire directionality
cryogenic treatment
longish burn-in
dielectric material
silver content in connectors 
I like Wire World Eclipse 7 power cords on my dac and transport,Eclipse 8 ics between dac and pre.Analysis Solo Crystal from pre to amp is 'the one',just perfect.I've got Analysis Solo Crystal Oval 8 speaker cables on the way now.If they give me more of what that ic is doing I'll be extremely happy.The timbre,depth,dynamics,etc. are just the way I like it.
What about a cable that is so different that it requires a magnitude different layer of physics to describe it? (QED vs LCR)

Would that bring perspective in and about wire, and what it (wire) actually sounds like, for the first time?

After all, all those frozen lattices are the same, re their transmission behavior. Carbon fiber, graphite, graphene, silver, gold, copper, alloys, all the dielectrics and everything in between... ---all the same.

The only actual and true difference available, is the liquid metal conductor. That’s it.

Everything you know and are immersed in live as and by..and thus cannot find a difference to be able to orient yourself.....and liquid metal as the only ’other’ choice.

The only one that can offer actual perspective (parallax view for the first time) on the idea of really finding out what wire does in an audio system, what wire makes things sound like.

One can hear differences in wire, but one cannot actually escape wire (all the lattice solids in the gear, the whole shebang) to be outside of godel’s incompleteness theorem (as applied to audio) and actually gain a fundamental point of perspective, to gain a critical point of knowing.

Liquid metal audio cable offers that new perspective.
Liquid metal. Don't Bogart that joint. And maybe cut back on the Terminator.