I just ordered some of those MNPCTECH feet as well. They are the aluminum model with the tapered top and made for a Technics SL-1200. I'm putting them on my Yamaha PX-3 that I'm restoring. I already rebuilt the tonearm assembly and now I'm waiting for my tech to recap the power supply and control boards. Should be a sweet table when I'm finished with it. BillWojo |
@nandric I substituted those with AT 636 footers under my Obsidian plinth Now when i have the manual for both models i can tell you they are completely different internally as i can see on schematic. So the difference is definitely NOT only the size. The bigger AT-616 (support up to 60kg) has different structure compared to smaller AT-636 (support up to 36kg). Not just bigger spring but entirely different design of pneumatic mechanism inside. |
Well my
MNPCTECH
feet came in today and they are very well constructed, the machining is first class and the rubber is nice and pliable. Once I get the table back together I'm sure they will work fine and it will look even better as well. https://www.ebay.com/itm/TECHNICS-SL1200-1210-mk2-mk3-mk4-mk5-DJ-Turntable-DOME-Style-FOUR-FEET/3032... BillWojo |
Dear chakster, I am very, very sorry to have insulted your (much bigger) footers, But your story remind me of this guy who wanted to impress his friend with his new swimming pool. ''End what is your impression?'' he asked. ''Well , uch, what should I say; is the 3x 3 m. not to small"? The guy was very angry: ''You idiot the pool is 25 m deep''. Aka: your footers can support 60 kg each while your TT is 20 (?) kg. heavy. My SP 10 is even lighter. |
