I tend to think 16/44khz is a product of scientists who knew what they were doing, and hi-rez is usually the product of marketers who know how to spin a tale. If the hi-rez purveyors are not sampling from analog tape, they'll likely selling refried beans.
The counter-(oranges) argument is a test that claimed double-blind viewers preferred watching 8k on a 65-inch TV even though they could not see a difference. "Double-blind viewing"?
Personally, I agree with Erik on DACs. I can't hear a difference between 16/44 Blood-on-Tracks and the hi-rez offering on a top modern DAC.
The counter-(oranges) argument is a test that claimed double-blind viewers preferred watching 8k on a 65-inch TV even though they could not see a difference. "Double-blind viewing"?
Personally, I agree with Erik on DACs. I can't hear a difference between 16/44 Blood-on-Tracks and the hi-rez offering on a top modern DAC.