The person that is most out of their depth on here is you. You try to bully people with technical terms that frankly you misuse and I (and others) certainly don't think you understand. You cannot even back up the most simple claims, i.e. about impedance matching when asked to explain and try to deflect claiming attacks and stolen patent issues. You have shown 0 understanding of "complex equations" and just use terms like that to bully others, or in attempts to look erudite, sort of like now using "Godel’s incompleteness theorem" on an audio forum. I mean really dude, what sort of person does that???
How about instead of spewing attempted math/physics philosophy, you actually communicate something that shows you have any level of true expertise in anything related to audio. I have seen you put down recognized experts in this field, but from where I am sitting, that now just looks like sour grapes.
You don't even get irony .... which is not at all a surprise. My statement was ridiculous, just like the one that proceeded it.
teo_audio1,215 posts11-08-2019 6:28pm You mean what think you perceive that you hear?
You are way out of your depth, on a complex set of equations and conditions that you know little to nothing about.
Which means you are likely to never get it. The intellectual version of Godel’s incompleteness theorem.
You can’t even get the sentence correct, nor realize it, after you pressed post.
