The science of opinion ...

I have no confidence in the confidence levels reported by the participants in that article.

The person that is most out of their depth on here is you. You try to bully people with technical terms that frankly you misuse and I (and others) certainly don't think you understand. You cannot even back up the most simple claims, i.e. about impedance matching when asked to explain and try to deflect claiming attacks and stolen patent issues.  You have shown 0 understanding of "complex equations" and just use terms like that to bully others, or in attempts to look erudite, sort of like now using  "Godel’s incompleteness theorem" on an audio forum. I mean really dude, what sort of person does that???


How about instead of spewing attempted math/physics philosophy, you actually communicate something that shows you have any level of true expertise in anything related to audio. I have seen you put down recognized experts in this field, but from where I am sitting, that now just looks like sour grapes.


You don't even get irony .... which is not at all a surprise. My statement was ridiculous, just like the one that proceeded it.

teo_audio1,215 posts11-08-2019 6:28pm

You mean what think you perceive that you hear?

You are way out of your depth, on a complex set of equations and conditions that you know little to nothing about.

Which means you are likely to never get it. The intellectual version of Godel’s incompleteness theorem.

You can’t even get the sentence correct, nor realize it, after you pressed post.

The OP has been here for 9 days now with an average of 23.5 posts per day. With all that typing, one would think you are making friends and influencing people. I think that might not be the case ...  

dill,

9 days and I have already received quite a few personal messages. I am quite happy to make friends with people I would want to be friends with in real life. 23.5? ... geoff does that in an hour.


Instead of reflecting on how many posts I have made in 9 days, perhaps reflect on who comes to this particular thread (and my 5 stages one). While some came in, made a comment and left, the usual suspects, the real prolific posters with many many thousands of posts, who pshaw the very notion of these two threads, are the ones repeatedly posting in them. Why are a few paragraphs of text so threatening?

atdavid, so now you're going to tell ME what I mean? A very succinctly wrote what I meant. It can be said one's perception is one's reality, Bla bla bla.....When I add a tweak to my system and I put on a song I know inside and out and hear a subtle nuance I've never heard before time and time again, yeah, I KNOW what I'm hearing. You are just another guy in a long line of guys that came before you trying to save the audio souls of those you perceive as ignorant, fooling themselves, being shilled etc....simply because we don't require reams of scientific evidence to back up why we hear what we hear, and if there is none forthcoming, we can't possibly be hearing it. 'Threatening'?? "Afraid of'?? What a joke. Amusing and mildly annoying, you bet.