Strange,
Even the people I know whose regular bottle of wine is $15.00, by the time they are old enough to be invited to a high end bubbly tasting party, know, and would never question whether a bottle of red, allowed to breath, would taste better .... having done that a 100 times themselves.
Of course, nice of someone to bring, or supply, two bottles of red, preferably bottled from the same barrel, to a bubbly tasting party. Rather convenient that the protagonist was an Engineer huh? Wouldn't have made it nearly as poignant a story if he wasn't.
I guess there is always a first, but then I was never much of a Dom Perignon Champagne lover and I don't play audiophile games with my non audiophile friends.
I had this one friend, he was so into wine and champagne he had this
annual champagne tasting party. Everyone would bring a bottle. He was so
knowledgeable he would open them in order. A lot like the way I will
play recordings of increasingly good quality as the night goes along, he
opened the sparking wines, then the Champagnes, then the Doms.
I
learned so much from this. In all the many years since, and all the
dozens of people I've told about this, not one has ever said, "Well
unless you were there in real life tasting the wines he was pouring at
his house...." Not once!
Now, I'll grant you, one wine
enthusiast did suggest a brown bag double-blind test to see if we all
really did prefer the wine be allowed to breathe before drinking.
(Spoiler: we did.) But then he was an engineer, and we all saw this more
as an interesting extra little challenge and excuse to open an extra
bottle than as anything else. Not a one of us ever questioned our own
sense experience. The way audiophiles do all the time.