Your powers of description do not match your level of enthusiasm. Can you say more clearly what you did? What I read starts with a question about a vinyl platter mat. And you point out that a vinyl mat might have the feature of draining energy put into the (vinyl) LP, due to the efficiency of transfer of energy from vinyl to vinyl (about as good as can be achieved, I agree). Then you go on to talk about the Resomat, which in my mind is the exact opposite approach; the LP is suspended in mid-air. Resonant energy can only be dissipated via the interface of the LP with air. (Maybe that's not so bad; I don't know.) Then I get confused. It seems you glued some stand-offs to the surface of an actual LP and used THAT as a mat, with the test LP sitting on top of those furniture thingies. If that's correct, what you created and used is most analogous to a Resomat. Correct? So here you are endorsing the idea of the Resomat, correct?
But you have not done, or at least not reported on, a comparison with a mat (vinyl or other) that actually might do a good job of draining resonant energy from an LP. In science, this is called a "control". And most of us, including me, have no idea what is a "G1042" or an "RCD971". And at the end, the whole thing is based on your subjective judgement, so all you can say is you arrived at something that seems to work well, for you alone in your system with your selection of rock LPs. That's fine.
But you have not done, or at least not reported on, a comparison with a mat (vinyl or other) that actually might do a good job of draining resonant energy from an LP. In science, this is called a "control". And most of us, including me, have no idea what is a "G1042" or an "RCD971". And at the end, the whole thing is based on your subjective judgement, so all you can say is you arrived at something that seems to work well, for you alone in your system with your selection of rock LPs. That's fine.