Another Music Direct Catalog observation


I didn't want to hijack an existing thread about the current catalog's Joni cover so I started this one.

You know, I was thinking about this after I received my catalog and how burned out I was on "boomer music". I know as a Gen Xer, I've been saturated by Boomer culture since I came of age in the 80's, and my appreciation for these artists has waned in part because of their saturation in audiophile circles.

Yes, the MD catalog does pay lip service to contemporary artists, but its adherence to a musical paradigm that peaked 45 years ago or so is symptomatic of the undeniable waning of "hi-fi" as a hobby.
128x128simao
The one thing I know for sure is that today's artists have moved away from the wall of sound developed by Phil Spector and I miss that sound a great deal. Multiple instruments playing the same part, brass and woodwinds, strings over the top, and backup singers calling back or repeating what the lead sang. To my ear, the wall of sound adds so much interest to a song and I can find myself ignoring the lead and singing the backup parts (I could have been a Pip). Speaking of the Pips, the wall of sound technique was also incorporated into a great deal of Motown recordings as well. Today's music just sounds so stripped down that it doesn't hold my interest, even if the melody is decent.
Much of today's pop music also sounds very similar, because it seems like to be a hit a song has to fit into a more and more narrowly defined structure of what constitutes a hit. I'm a boomer and of course I'm biased, but I think the period of 1972-1975 had so many different styles of what was acceptable to be a hit. You had the folk rock of the Eagles and Jackson Browne, the soft rock of America and Bread, the hard rock of Led Zeppelin, Rolling Stones, and The Who, the pop rock of the Carpenters and Elton John, the glam rock of Bowie, and the progressive rock of Pink Floyd, Yes, Rush, and Jethro Tull, as well as a huge number of Motown acts. They were experimenting and developing and unlike today, were given more than just one album to develop their sounds. 
Is there good music still being made today? Absolutely, but it's not what's being played on the radio and it's much more difficult to find. The one suggestion I have for people seeking good music is to look past the hit songs of even these artists from the period I mentioned and try to find deeper cuts because many of those deeper cuts are great as well. I find it kind of sad that even classic rock radio stations of today all have such small playlists. There's some great stuff from 1972-1975 that didn't make it big on the radio but still deserves a chance to be heard.
Reminds me of applying for a weekend job at the local record store around 1983. Manager reeled off about 5 current artists and I responded with a blank stare. Told him that I only bought music that had been out at least 5 years before buying the album. Needless to say they stayed in business a few more years without my services. 

It all comes down to economics.

But there's no real analogy between the industrial military complex known as the music industry churning out mindless pabulum that is pre-designed to achieve hit status, vs. the bottom-line antics of figuring out to pay an 80-strong group of professional instrumentalists a living wage.