New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies


Many of you own or have read of the highly-regarded PPT Omega E Mat, one of Tim Mrock’s revolutionary signal-enhancing accessories. Just prior to his untimely passing, Tim had finished developing a new generation of his Omega mat, soon to be available. Krissy Mrock has asked a few of us to introduce this new mat, here given the working title of The Double Omega.

In distinguishing the Double Omega, we know the original Omega, herein called the single, as a 7.5” by 10”, rather heavy and somewhat pliable mat, a bit more than 1/8” thick and with a vinyl-like feel. One face is glossy white, displaying the PPT logo and Omega name, while the other is black, smooth and magnetized. Sandwiched between these faces is the active material that causes components to reject the EMI that saturates everything in our surroundings. The Double Omega is much the same, with one important difference: the magnetized face has the finely-textured feel of around, say, 220-grit sandpaper. This texture, it is presumed, comprises yet a second active layer of EMI rejection. Presumed—because working details of the Double Omega are not well understood—better yet to know how to apply it.

With the understanding that the single Omega E mats generate field effects from both faces, mats have typically been placed under and over components and vertically over circuit breakers. How you apply the Double Omega will depend on best use and experimentation. In my case, I have removed two single mats, lying side-by-side, from the top of my large Wadia CDP and have replaced those with two Double Omegas. The Wadia is a one-box player that contains a pre-amp, so I wanted that second, strong field effect exerting downward as well as upward. I also have several singles placed underneath, just as before. Going straight to amps, this player is my only source, so I want it fully protected from EMI. Your priorities will differ.

As of this writing, I am only thirty-hours in on placing these Double Omegas, and I can already tell you they are powerful in their prevention of EMI within my digital source. Yet another veil has been lifted—all instruments and voices are even more sorted out in the aural space with new information heard within that space. There is much more decay heard against a new silence behind and between the musicians. I am already so pleased and excited about what the Double Omega E mats are doing. As Krissy told me, Tim was really stoked to have these new mats available. Rather than wait for the the fourteen-day window of improvement, I want to get this intro out so others can relay their experiences sooner.


128x128jafreeman
@spenav  

My system is comprised of a power conditioner, sacd/cd player and an integrated amp.  I have moved twice and had to reapply to my system both times. I gave my Total Contact to two friends to apply to throughout their systems.  They both have larger systems with multiple sources. I have also applied to multiple fuses and vacuum tube pins that have been changed out a few times. I still have a little left.  I found the application of Total Contact in my system to have the greatest effect to be on the tube pins.

Off-topic, I know, but this is good.

A little Saturday afternoon side excursion through the Vox guitar amplifier and Rock & Roll history, brought to you by my friend Robert. Hope you all enjoy it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQud4emaSek

Frank


Frank,
I also enjoy your musical comments.  Strictly speaking, they don't relate to the E mat topic, so I hope the moderator doesn't take this too literally and delete all these pleasant comments.  Clearly, the E mats have brought joy to many people, and their enthusiasm naturally spills over into these other topics.  The moderator should only delete negative comments centered around personal attacks.
Yes, when I described that some "sonic landmarks" were no longer as prominent, it's not that those sounds are rolled off, rather, there is so much more information filled in around them, they don't stand out in a formerly stark background. A lot of the music was actually missing before the mats. I mean, it was there, just not audible through the noise competing with it. From this, I have posited that EMI is what the mats remove/block/reject from the real signal.  
I use a dozen E-mats and had 2 on top and 1 under my EAR Acute CD player.  The mats improved resolution, depth, "warmth"  and dynamics on the power panels, CD player, phono and pre-amp and isolation transformer.  They did nothing when I placed two on top and under my Altec hugely modified amps which is okay.  The E-Mat placed on the DAC came from a power panel E-Mat.  The DAC has a more laid back sound than my EAR Acute or Frank's modified Pioneer CD player.  With the E-Mat, the sound came forward, shortening the depth and while revealing more detail, boosted the highs.  The 3 days I gave it made no difference as it retained the same less pleasant character.  

I have the same problem with the SR Atmosphere XL4.  I cannot place it between my speakers (rear, even or in front).  It ruins the imaging.  I have it against the wall near my seating.  It also doesn't sound good on well recorded stereo.  I use it to add "warmth"/soundstage width and depth to mono recordings, particularly if they are not well recorded or "dry" sounding.  Example is the Dave Pell Trend recordings now on 2 CDs.  They are almost boring to hear without the Atmosphere.  With it set to Holographic mode, it expands the sound in every direction and apparent "warmth."    

I tried the E-Mat experiment twice, first I was lazy and used one of the 3 E-Mats I had on top of the EAR Acute.  Same result.  So it's not due to a "cold" mat.  Analog sound didn't change so the panel mat removal wasn't critical (I'm sure someone will comment I wrecked the sound by removing one panel mat-nope).  They just don't work everywhere.  A mutual friend had the same problem using the E-Cards.  Didn't do much for his all solid state audio system either.