2. misc-audio
  3. 152899-117374

Has to be said

Hi,
i been reading most sites and the little arguments about this and that about making audio in this case be more pleasent ot better to any individual. and have to say upfront that if "you" believe its better to you than it is in fact true to you and you only. we are just reletive respondants to each other and therefore nature and the universe.
many of the subjects that come up as to improving ones audio system tend to go into little details that may or may not have "real" affects on most of us. and also be provable with phsics,math,medical studies etc.many musicians and many humans can distinguish alot of these aspects. and they are ALL quantifiable and measureable very easilly. from 1800 till today FFT and resonance,sound perfiliration has been well adjustable from the totally acoustic pipe organs to the music halls 100s of years ago with out electronic fixes, and all these new snake oil gagets on the market. many are always big commenters here on this site.
Its totally true you can "fix" and sound wave with free rocks,walls,chambers, etc. so go for it at a cost of zero dollars. and adbandon all these marketing hacks.
Ive been well into sound,RF,Radioation, Electron manulipation, Audio,phsics etc all my life and all my relatives aslso . I dont need to justify my opinions yet am dignified by holding 8 international patents,2 doctrets and my dad with similar fields.
one crazy obvious thing no one even bothers to mention is the way off standard of 440hz shifted 8hz the earths standard resonance. while all the 1000s of years 432hz was based on real natural happenings before electronics. dont you all care everything you listen to is 8hz off tune and therefore wrong, but you will bicker about a few microvolts noise from an ocslittating wire with parallell wire  hanging off a standoff. itf too funny to me.
yes all digital except one source tunes their DAC math to 435hz to be more correct to Verdi and other great composers.
ive got tuning forks over the audio and above spectrum and tune my panios violins etc to them 432 hz
and need to say again. yes please do everything Analoge
to correct your sound system, its been done in churches,music halls,the great pyrmids, with instruments themselves.
but do not chase the rabbit down the money hole to fix apparent physhoacoustics in your listening area.

ps the spelling and writing is horrid cause ive got a brain injury2 years ago and under go EEG,ehthesographs and neuro studies constantly. where various frequency sweeps are put thru me and studied by the medical and commercial fields.
Im off for now to play my bass thru 50000watts total. and resonate the neighborhood at 8.2 HZ....

128x128hemigreg
sailboat
45 posts
 
sorry, autocorrect changed the spelling.  I typed PHOTONS but in several places the autocorrect replaced photon with PHOTOS.  

Sorry.  note it was Audiogon's autocorrect that did this.  not my autocorrect in my computer.  

sailboat.
ishkabibil
422 posts
 
432 hz to 440 hz is irellevent...
Pitch has been altered in many recordings anyways....

An interesting read nonetheless. 
mahgister's avatar
mahgister
13,197 posts
 
sailboat
if you really want to get into discussions of how electronic waves propagate in circuits, you need to look into the work of Dr. Ivan Ndip at Fraunhofer IZM in Berlin. fascinating stuff. those waves don’t confine themselves to the wires or circuit traces on a board or wiring harness.

Very interesting stuff...

I use shungite stones+copper tape on one side, in my audio experiments, is it possible that the stones+copper affected the signals trough some sort of passive filtering decreasing the noise floor trough interaction with the electronic waves ? I ask to you because the effect is stunningly good, cheap and I had no explanation to date...It is my idea and it gives my system a boost in all counts... I use that on the central breaker panel, interconnect even on top of the capacitors of my Schumann Generators etc....Thanks for your time...
glupson
7,842 posts
 
I.e., portable CD player/headphone system, you can reduce mass a lot more AND eliminate even more things that produce distortion and noise -
That is what world is going towards, or has already gone to. Eliminating CDs altogether. That eliminates CD players, too. It eliminates vibrations, maybe decreases need for isolation, and even decreases need for New Dark Matter. Oops! Did I just say that?

"Interconnects, speaker cables, digital cable, big power supplies."
Headphone cable is, effectively, a speaker cable. Thankfully, those have become obsolete, too.

As Michael Green correctly said many times (maybe not in exact words but to that effect), low-mass systems are what people of the future are going for.

Just ask any 16-year-old would they rather have red iPhone 11 with Airpods Pro, or Pass amplifier or two.
rhodes
123 posts
 
he started wave influence with sensors that could identify german diesel locols on the track in europe to blow up supply trains. ive still got them too. they could differentiate from empty train,coal loco,freight car or coal car in front of lolo. so only the prime movweer would be blown up. all using specific harmonics,band gaps,resonaces and carbon steel wheel capacitance to the rail at passing.  yea Im bad heavy into this stuff.
 
A little off track here (punn intended) if you mean blowing up diesel trains during WW II I am not sure many trains would be blown up. More likely steam engines.  If they could only detect German diesel engines I would run German steam engines. 
More to discover