Has to be said


Hi,
i been reading most sites and the little arguments about this and that about making audio in this case be more pleasent ot better to any individual. and have to say upfront that if "you" believe its better to you than it is in fact true to you and you only. we are just reletive respondants to each other and therefore nature and the universe.
many of the subjects that come up as to improving ones audio system tend to go into little details that may or may not have "real" affects on most of us. and also be provable with phsics,math,medical studies etc.many musicians and many humans can distinguish alot of these aspects. and they are ALL quantifiable and measureable very easilly. from 1800 till today FFT and resonance,sound perfiliration has been well adjustable from the totally acoustic pipe organs to the music halls 100s of years ago with out electronic fixes, and all these new snake oil gagets on the market. many are always big commenters here on this site.
Its totally true you can "fix" and sound wave with free rocks,walls,chambers, etc. so go for it at a cost of zero dollars. and adbandon all these marketing hacks.
Ive been well into sound,RF,Radioation, Electron manulipation, Audio,phsics etc all my life and all my relatives aslso . I dont need to justify my opinions yet am dignified by holding 8 international patents,2 doctrets and my dad with similar fields.
one crazy obvious thing no one even bothers to mention is the way off standard of 440hz shifted 8hz the earths standard resonance. while all the 1000s of years 432hz was based on real natural happenings before electronics. dont you all care everything you listen to is 8hz off tune and therefore wrong, but you will bicker about a few microvolts noise from an ocslittating wire with parallell wire  hanging off a standoff. itf too funny to me.
yes all digital except one source tunes their DAC math to 435hz to be more correct to Verdi and other great composers.
ive got tuning forks over the audio and above spectrum and tune my panios violins etc to them 432 hz
and need to say again. yes please do everything Analoge
to correct your sound system, its been done in churches,music halls,the great pyrmids, with instruments themselves.
but do not chase the rabbit down the money hole to fix apparent physhoacoustics in your listening area.

ps the spelling and writing is horrid cause ive got a brain injury2 years ago and under go EEG,ehthesographs and neuro studies constantly. where various frequency sweeps are put thru me and studied by the medical and commercial fields.
Im off for now to play my bass thru 50000watts total. and resonate the neighborhood at 8.2 HZ....

128x128hemigreg
@geoffkait 

"Sorry, but you missed my point entirely. The electromagnetic wave - the Schumann wave - is photons. All electromagnetic waves are photons. Like say, X-rays, radio waves, Gamma rays. That’s why all electromagnetic waves travel at c in a vacuum. Everybody and his brother has seen the blue Cherenkov radiation."

Geoffkait.. often I agree with your posts.  But this one is simply NOT TRUE.  All electromagnetic waves are not photos. All photons are electromagnetic waves... but all electromagnetic waves are not photos.  

In the realm of audio systems these waves are electrons propagating through the circuits until the transducer (speaker) converts those electrons into sound waves.  Even the digital signals are still electromagnetic waves.  Just shaped and pulsed to make a digital signal.

Now I am not going to write a phd thesis here.  But to be clear; I absolutely know what I am talking about.  degree in physics.  degree in math.  degree in chemistry.  more to the point; I spent the last 30 years helping build the worldwide communications networks.  

EVERY bit, ever communications over copper or wireless or fiber... every communications in the entire world uses technology that I helped invent.  A company I founded created optical devices that today carry (not kidding here) more than 60% of ALL GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS traffic of all kinds.  

I helped develop the worlds fastest modulators.  Communications lasers.  complex network systems.  

I was one of the very first users of what later became the internet.  Back when only 5 universities had links to DarpaNet.  

I have been involved with every major communications advance in the last 30 years.

I sit on standards bodies.

All electromagnetic waves are not photons.  There are waves propagated by electrons.  RF waves that propagate in both space and atmospheres.  X rays, gamma rays.. again, not photons.

Yes, all photons are expressions of electromagnetic waves.  but all waves are not photons. 

if you really want to get into discussions of how electronic waves propagate in circuits, you need to look into the work of Dr. Ivan Ndip at Fraunhofer IZM in Berlin.  fascinating stuff.  those waves don't confine themselves to the wires or circuit traces on a board or wiring harness.  if you really want to drive noise low, it gets down into small details of how you do the vias in your PCB, how you lay out the traces in 3 dimensions and more.  

Note: my last invention runs at over 400Ghz per lambda and aggregated over the DWDM spectrum, can carry over 20Tbits on a single fiber.  

I was also deeply involved with the creation of both 4g and the upcoming 5g wireless standards.  

And early in my career helped build the first cellular networks in the world.

I personally know and work with the CTO's of Verizon, ATT, Sprint, T-Mobile, DT, BT, China Mobile, NTT, Google, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon... well you get the picture.

I am deeply embedded in the world of photons and manipulating them.

again, normally you are right on with your comments.  But this one is not accurate. 

sailboat
Quite fascinating the 432/440 debate

Why do we not just slow down all our music by 2%, thereby effectively "retuning" to 432?


sorry, autocorrect changed the spelling.  I typed PHOTONS but in several places the autocorrect replaced photon with PHOTOS.  

Sorry.  note it was Audiogon's autocorrect that did this.  not my autocorrect in my computer.  

sailboat.
432 hz to 440 hz is irellevent...
Pitch has been altered in many recordings anyways....

An interesting read nonetheless. 
sailboat
if you really want to get into discussions of how electronic waves propagate in circuits, you need to look into the work of Dr. Ivan Ndip at Fraunhofer IZM in Berlin. fascinating stuff. those waves don’t confine themselves to the wires or circuit traces on a board or wiring harness.

Very interesting stuff...

I use shungite stones+copper tape on one side, in my audio experiments, is it possible that the stones+copper affected the signals trough some sort of passive filtering decreasing the noise floor trough interaction with the electronic waves ? I ask to you because the effect is stunningly good, cheap and I had no explanation to date...It is my idea and it gives my system a boost in all counts... I use that on the central breaker panel, interconnect even on top of the capacitors of my Schumann Generators etc....Thanks for your time...