How Science Got Sound Wrong


I don't believe I've posted this before or if it has been posted before but I found it quite interesting despite its technical aspect. I didn't post this for a digital vs analog discussion. We've beat that horse to death several times. I play 90% vinyl. But I still can enjoy my CD's.  

https://www.fairobserver.com/more/science/neil-young-vinyl-lp-records-digital-audio-science-news-wil...
128x128artemus_5
Listen to the video documentary with the link I gave, after that your mind will be "blown" about that... :)

Luc Montagner is a laboratory scientist, and dont entertain crowds about memory water with a "pet" theory of his own making...
And perhaps sound is like water and transport information in a way unknown to us when we use Fourier analysis...But this theory of mine, is a "pet" theory indeed, because I am by no way at all a scientist and I am probably wrong .... I only here wanted to give an example of a " pet" theory... :)
I did my best. I gave it the smell test. But I don’t think I can use it. Now, the ice crystal thing I can use! Information fields I get and I can use them. But best wishes for you and your pets.
There has never ever been a successful test of a homeopathic solution. Complete and total failure.  The "memory of water" was a hypothesis with no basis in reality.


In the war between an homeopath for example and some scientist pick by chance in a forum thread, where is the true scientist ?

Too bad some certain types of memory cannot be erased.  Actually I haven't had enough beers to find out.  Or maybe some really expensive Hennessy - those of the very smooth operator.