Plus my friends there is another level to the digital system that HEA has not discovered.
http://tuneland.forumotion.com/t509-my-low-mass-tunable-setup#9074
Another Analog v. Digital Thread? Not Really
Plus my friends there is another level to the digital system that HEA has not discovered. http://tuneland.forumotion.com/t509-my-low-mass-tunable-setup#9074 |
I don't have a turntable any more so I can't really comment on the comparison. But in the past few years of having access to good quality content through streaming, I have discovered more music I love than in the previous 40 years as an audiophile. I couldn't imagine giving that up at this point. I love finding more music, and while I certainly have my favorites that I go back to often, I love discovering new artists, and even new genres that I never paid attention to in the past. Since I am close to retiring, I am also watching my hifi budget much more than I have in years past, so the idea of splitting my more-limited budget between digital and analog doesn't make sense to me. If I'm going to spend $3K, $5K, or $10K more on my audio system, I'd rather spend it on upgrading my digital front-end (or other components) instead of adding a decent quality turntable, tonearm, cartridge and phono stage. And that's before investing in any actual music, which is what it's all about. |
Putting aside mastering, I think well tuned digital surpasses analog above about $6k. Hi-rez is really exceptional, but even SoX upsampling from 16/44 is quite good now. Everything matters, and you have to pay a lot of attention to source PC, program, OS tuning, noise, power supplies, tweaks, etc but spinning disks are legacy tech now IMO. The bit about "good digital sounds like analog so why bother" is missing what's happening. As digital improves, it loses that harshness, glare and eventually becomes liquid and then tonally rich. So that trend is towards analog, but it retains all the benefits of digital too, low distortion, no surface noise, RIAA, wear, and physical limitations and resonances. I’m very happy with a few years old Bel Canto stack RefLink, DAC3.5mk2, VBL, and looking forward to my next upgrade, probably the Black DAC-Pre with MQA and fed by an Ether-Regen. Agree with Jaytor, sold my TT and records in ’95 haven’t looked back, but it did take 20 years longer than I expected for digital to really excel. It’s still climbing faster in price/performance than analog too. |
All other things being equal, in my experience a good turntable/cartridge/Phono preamp combination still beats the crap out a good DAC or a CD (even when the digital unit is tuned and tweaked to sound as warm and analog as possible). Good digital will beat middling or mediocre analog but it will not beat out a out a good analog rig. If vinyl noise is an issue I would suggest you try a Sugarcube by a company called SweetVinyl. This component removes the the ticks and pops inaudibly-- and even though yes, it does this digitally (in the time domain), the AD-DA conversion is studio quality and in virtually all cases you will be unable to hear this device in your chain whether it's engaged or bypassed (they use hard relays for bypass so the audio passes through none of their circuitry). This is my opinion, but I do have a fairly high resolution system that picks up minute detail. I use it for noisy records only, usually it's in bypass mode. They have models that also rip your vinyl, split the tracks, and allow you to easily add the metadata just by entering the LP's catalog number. Best of both worlds. |