Me vs. JL Audio - An open discussion.


An audiophile ( dpac996 ) in another thread:


https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/eh-hem-subwoofers-what-do-ya-know


found a very interesting, and IMNSHO, very messy, post from JL Audio:

https://jlaudio.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/205061040-Adding-a-Home-Audio-Subwoofer


It has some great points, some confusing points, and some word salad. Kind of like a recent Star Wars movie.


Mind you, I think JL Audio has among the very best room correction software out there. I find myself agreeing very much with the choices the software makes, but still, this article has some great things in it I want to bring out, which I'll do in my replies.
erik_squires
There is actually an even worse way to do this:

Use DSP to create your crossovers, then global EQ to bang the living heck out of the results.  UGH.  I see this not just with subs but with multi-way DIY systems.  Don't do that.
@dweller 

I have a pair of E110’s and I think they sound great. Both have failed at different times and were sent back to JL to be repaired. They still sound great but a bit of a hassle.
I've never owned JL Audio subs. I like their performance and the measurements I've seen of their room tuning quite a bit.

However, wow. Super expensive.


Hard to believe the average audiophile can't get a lot more value using a Hsu or SVS sub with appropriate room correction.
The CR-1 is also a noteworthy device that can help you achieve a near perfect balance between your subs and speakers. 

I won't buy JL subs ever again though.  For the price they charge, you should have a much longer lasting product.  I too have had both amps fail on a pair of E110's, and have had major headaches because if it. For your money, you can get a more durable and equally sounding sub.  I miss the looks of my E110's (they are indeed a sexy device), but not the migraines induced from dealing with them failing.