Yes, great links. That live Johnny Griffin Clip is wonderful.
Thanks for your thoughts and great clips, pjw. I agree with all you wrote. Hancock is a genius. I don’t think I have heard anything by him that I have not liked; acoustic or electronic.
And, thanks for your thoughts also, mary_jo. I must say that I got a very different sense of what you were trying to say from your first post on the subject. I appreciate what you are saying; I’m just not sure that such a strong distinction is justified nor accurate. And, I wouldn’t even call the “magic” (emotional reaction) necessarily that “different” in kind.
**** . I would NOT underestimate the power of rose glasses in art in particular, you know, ’cause that is what moves the fan (admirer). And having fan who is moved is what all is about, right? ****
I think we have different views here. I agree, the power of rose colored glasses is very real, but it’s not always a good thing, IMO. Sometimes, factors other than just the music influence a listener’s reaction to it. Having known a performer personally, or having heard a song that one associates with a memorable life experience, or even liking a particular instrument more than another influences the level of “magic” that one experiences from a performance. Very normal, but that is the rose colored glasses effect.
Most serious artists not only would prefer that their art NOT be viewed through rose colored glasses, they don’t feel that having fans is “what it is all about”. They would prefer to be true to their vision of the art and if fans want to come along for the ride that’s great. Of course, some are more compromising than others and all of them have to eat.
Thanks for your thoughts and great clips, pjw. I agree with all you wrote. Hancock is a genius. I don’t think I have heard anything by him that I have not liked; acoustic or electronic.
And, thanks for your thoughts also, mary_jo. I must say that I got a very different sense of what you were trying to say from your first post on the subject. I appreciate what you are saying; I’m just not sure that such a strong distinction is justified nor accurate. And, I wouldn’t even call the “magic” (emotional reaction) necessarily that “different” in kind.
**** . I would NOT underestimate the power of rose glasses in art in particular, you know, ’cause that is what moves the fan (admirer). And having fan who is moved is what all is about, right? ****
I think we have different views here. I agree, the power of rose colored glasses is very real, but it’s not always a good thing, IMO. Sometimes, factors other than just the music influence a listener’s reaction to it. Having known a performer personally, or having heard a song that one associates with a memorable life experience, or even liking a particular instrument more than another influences the level of “magic” that one experiences from a performance. Very normal, but that is the rose colored glasses effect.
Most serious artists not only would prefer that their art NOT be viewed through rose colored glasses, they don’t feel that having fans is “what it is all about”. They would prefer to be true to their vision of the art and if fans want to come along for the ride that’s great. Of course, some are more compromising than others and all of them have to eat.