Best Sounding Bruckner Recordings


There is a Mahler for Audiophiles thread here, but I am not sure if there is one for Bruckner.  IMO these are the two Composers that benefit the most from high quality sound.  Both Composers relied extensively upon spatial effects.  Bruckner, with his Organist background, was conscious of reverberation effects, and tended to treat the entire Orchestra as one vast Organ.  Mahler had many spatial effects built into his Symphonies.
  I listen to many historical recordings, but I find that these two composers suffer the most when sonically compromised.  I have no problem enjoying a Toscanini Beethoven Symphony, as the majesty of the music and the playing overcome sonic limitations.  However, listening to the Horenstein Bruckner Seventh from 1927 is a real trial.  Even the best restorations make it sound like it was recorded in a phone booth, and the towering beauty of the piece is missing.
  Now, with Bruckner, we have the problem of all of those multiple editions.  I am going to confess straight out that I have no expertise here .  And given that this is an audiophile site, I will concede readily that the best sounding Bruckner recordings may not necessarily be the ultimate in recorded performance.  However, I am looking for comments about great sounding Bruckner recordings that are also good performances 
mahler123
The Ninth was my “gateway “ into Bruckner.  The first Bruckner I encountered was the Fourth, when I was in College about 4 decades ago.  It was entertaining but one can only take so much medieval knights jousting background music.  I heard the Seventh in concert and was bored to tears except the Scherzo.  Finally I heard a Gunter Wand CD of the Ninth and was blown away.  I really hate the completions of the Ninth, not only because I am used to the 3 movement torso, but because anything that winds up coming after those final mystical chords just seems to cheapen the experience.
  I don’t listen my to the First two Symphonies, let alone the 0 and 00.  Of the Te Deum, my only recording is one that is tacked on to the end of Ninth as a Choral completion.  As I mentioned I hated any completion of the Ninth so I haven’t spun that CD for a couple of decades.  I did hear the Te Deum recently on the radio (I listen to Radio Venice, and the Bluesound App will identify the composition but not the performers), and liked it quite a bit, so I would also be interested in recommendations there.
  Karajan Bruckner is very polarizing.  Most critical opinion that I have read is negative, and it was only relatively recently that I began to investigate for myself.  I love it.  When Von K felt sympathy for a Composer he could do great things, and the playing of the Berlin Phil. Is breathtaking.
  I have heard good things elsewhere about Venzago.  Time to check Qobuz for his recordings.
   I listened to the Jochum/Dresden Sixth a few weeks back.  Maybe not as much rubato as I remember, or perhaps he tones it down in that relatively restrained work.  I will have to respin that cycle.
  Bruckner doesn’t consistently interest me as much as the composer with whom he is frequently compared and contrasted, namely Mahler, but in a few spots he really strikes gold.  He also is perhaps the most challenging Composer for an audio system, and therefore a great composer to discuss on Agon.
Karajan's performances of Bruckner #4, 7, 8 on EMI circa 1970 are magnificent IMO. The young Karajan with his Berliners approach Bruckner slowly and with such passion. These are the recordings that move me.

@mahler123, I absolutely agree with you regarding the completion of the 9th symphony. A fourth movement is unnecessary and "those final mystical chords" provide a finality to the beautiful adagio and preceding movements.




I always thought the Bruno Walter was the classic Bruckner 9.  Anyway, it's the one I cut my teeth on as a teenager; all others sound different and slightly "wrong".
My first Bruckner was Barenboim/Chicago #4, followed by HvK #9, followed by Jochum/Dresden 6 and 8, all on vinyl.  It was the Jochum that pulled me in on Bruckner.  Barenboim put me to sleep and HvK had me looking over my shoulder in fear. 
I really think Bruckner is done a great disservice by comparing him to Mahler.  He is never, in my opinion, going to fare well in that comparison.  I think it is much better to let him stand on his own and speak with his own voice.   
What that voice should be I leave to others who are better positioned than me to comment.  But I do think Venzago takes a stab at something different.  Elsewhere I stated that Venzago's Bruckner is for people who don't love Bruckner.  Each symphony is recorded in a different venue with a different orchestra, so recording quality varies as you work your way through the set. 
  I agree that the constant comparisons between Bruckner and Mahler are a disservice to both Composers.  I have always thought, however, that these are the two Composers that benefited most from the advent of the long playing (lp) record.  I personally heard Mahler/5 and Bruckner/7 both in concert prior to hearing any recorded performance.  Both times I reacted negatively; at the time I was still absorbing Mozart, Beethoven, Tchakovsky, Bach, Handel....you know, the certifiable greats.  Mahler and Bruckner were just then entering the Canon, but it took the availability of recordings in my case to permeate my prejudices.  I could listen to 1 or 2 movements at a time and get accustomed to the style and recognize the landmarks.  Then having a toehold of interest, I was more receptive to, and ultimately able to appreciate the beauty.  I don’t think that my experience is unique, and I don’t think that improvements In playback technology after WWII are given the credit that it deserves for developing interest in both Composers