2. speakers
  3. 153422-20253

The best tweeter is no tweeter

In a recent review in Stereophile for the Elac Carina over an AMT based speaker (I’m a fan of AMTs by the way) the author, Herb Reichert, makes this statement:

My personal experience suggests that the overall sound of any loudspeaker is greatly determined by the designer’s choice of tweeter.


and then he goes on to list some speakers with AMTs, some of which I like, some of which I hate, which he feels share the same qualities. And it got me thinking about something as I hook up my home theater again. In my mind, the very best tweeters are completely invisible and transparent. I do not suggest you should use a single-driver, full ranger with a whizzer, heavens no. That’s just wrong (grin) and a clear cry for help.


What I am suggesting is that in the very best tweeters in the world, of which some are AMTs, and many are not, you simply cannot tell what they are.


That is, they are absolutely transparent. You do not perceive sound emanating from them at all. Music is just there, in front of you. Some of these are ring radiators that are really reasonably priced. Some are German or Spanish AMTs, some are diamond or Be tweeters.


In fact, my home theater has both ring radiators and AMTs in them, both of which may be found among the most prestigious brands of speakers. Though they have entirely different operating principles and materials, their performance is absolutely seamless. I barely use EQ except for the sub and center due to the latter’s location on a shelf. What both of these tweeters share is incredibly smooth output (unlike crappy AMTs or Be tweets) that is flat to beyond 20 kHz.


Please, buy what you like, but to me, if you want to talk about a world class driver, it’s not one you can sit in front of and say "aha! I know this is an Aluminum/Be/Diamond/AMT tweeter!!"


If you can tell the type of tweeter you are listening to, I can assure you it is not among the best in the world.
erik_squires
crustycoot
644 posts
 
The problem with most speakers is that the drivers don't add up to flat power output unless you are in the right place, which we call "the sweet spot".  It's worse with disparate polar patterns,  Long ribbons, like Magnepan uses in the 3.7i and up can mitigate this.  20.7s and 30.7s are pretty awesome in their orchestral scale, coherency, and naturlism.
IMO, to be "best" a speaker would have to have flat power response in a quarter sphere radiation pattern and keep the sound coherent no matter where the listener is.  Ohm Acoustics tries to do this with many of their Walsh-derived models, which I have not heard.  German Physiks uses the Walsh principle for a full 360 degrees, just as the old Ohm F did, but given their advanced materials technology, just might be my candidate for a "best".  Anyone familiar with these?
erik_squires OP
16,242 posts
 
The problem with most speakers is that the drivers don't add up to flat power output unless you are in the right place, which we call "the sweet spot".



This is only true if your definition of an ideal speaker is one with the widest sweet spot. Many are deliberately designed to avoid this in order to better work with room acoustics.  Further, show me a mastering room which uses an omni? If there are any, they are super rare.

Of course, buy what you like. :) Just saying that when you take a position like this you are doing so because you favor some things and not others.

georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi
10,312 posts
 
crustycoot
The problem with most speakers is that the drivers don’t add up to flat power output unless you are in the right place, which we call "the sweet spot"

Best tweeter by far that is 360’, and so transparent it floats front it’s image like firefly’s front of you that you can reach out and touch, no other tweeter can match these, it’s a non horn loaded Plasma tweeter.

I have a pair that xover from my ESL’s and are truly way above anything else for a tweeter even the ESL’s, as the diaphragm is ionized air created by the Plasma flame, there is no mass, and the signal pulsates that ionized cone of air, they also extend out to 150khz with no resonate ringing, no phase shift with these down into the audible frequencies.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Magnat-Plasma-MP-02-ion-tweeter-massless-air-plasma-speaker-Plasmahochtoner/282700838884?hash=item41d24877e4:g:yJkAAOSwTmtZ6PwI

Cheers George
emailists
923 posts
 
I had to click George’s link to see that ion plasma tweeter, which seems so interesting but then I read reports of that model generating ozone, which is not healthy.

What are are people’s opinions of electrostatic treble?

I happen to augment my beryllium tweeters with permanently charged horn loaded electrostatic tweeters (enigmacoustics) coming in at 10khz.

I sometime turn them around to use as rear ambience tweeters and am looking for something to use as permanent rear ambience.
georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi
10,312 posts
 
I had to click George’s link to see that ion plasma tweeter, which seems so interesting but then I read reports of that model generating ozone, which is not healthy.
Yeah but it’s minuscule amount, and I always have a door or a window open just in case. They sound magnificent, highs are like delicate firefly’s dancing in air in front of you. They will blow you away hearing a good recording of a real old school Harpsicord being played through them, as they have a very complex harmonic structure decay to it’s fundamental.

And there are "ozone generators" (negative-ion generators) that charge the air with negative ions and they smell the same, they are used and said to keep people alert at work or in offices. The smell is something like I smelt once in a very dry air underground cave that had stalagmites and stalactites in it. And it said to be in the air just before a summer rain shower, you know how you say you can smell the rain coming, that the ozone you smell 

Cheers George

More to discover