Moving cables around killed dynamics for days anyone else experience this?

This definitely sheds some light on problems I've had with this new room. Once a few cables were moved and sound deteriorated I thought if I moved speakers and in turn moving speaker wire closer to front wall bass would come back but that wasnt the case. I would walk away and come back next day and system was still lacking. So I flipped around some power cords. I even went to the extent of pulling out some different tubes to fix things. Viscous cycle. So if moving cables does affect sound all I was doing was prolonging having the system leveling out and not improving things. What an eye opener.

All of this reminds me of a cartoon that The Audio Critic had where the audiophile was behind his stereo, holding some cables, and yelling at his family, "Who the hell cleaned back here?", or something like that.

It was meant to ridicule folk like us but it turns out that it was quite prescient, but not in the way it was intended.

All the best,
Nonoise

nonoise5,235 posts01-07-2020 8:35pmAll of this reminds me of a cartoon that The Audio Critic had where the audiophile was behind his stereo, holding some cables, and yelling at his family, "Who the hell cleaned back here?", or something like that.

Very funny! Sounds like me. Thanks

The scientific answer to these questions, about the known efficacy and acts committed to gain discernible results... the questions about them... have recently been conclusively answered in the world of reporting on cutting edge physics.

When that goes public enough (this is research and is valuable re product design and so on--so it will not be revealed as to where this data and reporting was found), the naysayers , those ’beat everyone up’ misanthropes...will simply hop onto an attack bandwagon (gangs of roving attack illiterates) on the next thing they are failing to understand.

Expect it like the Spanish inquisition.

the naysayers will poutily say.. "who’s your source on that?" 

And the answer will be akin to "Los Alamos National Laboratory’, or ’the "The Planck institute of Germany", or "MIT", or.....(you get the idea).

But, you see, the noted effect was real for 20-30-40 years before that particular institute comes along and explained the science and physics behind the given noted effect. Time apparently exists but we still can’t get any functional labels on it, they all slide off. Yet everyone here accepts the existence of time.

Just like all the others noted effects that might remain afterward, or came before. Just like reality and 3-d time space has in it, all day long, since the beginnings of time.

That some institute frames the thing today does not mean it did not exist beforehand. Science's explanation is not the arbiter of reality it is just an attempt at framing an explanation. Nothing more. an explanation that is ready to change or be dismissed at any moment. Science. Mutable. By design. Correctly so.

This is one of the core problems of dogmatic minds, with said minds trying to express themselves through higher learning. They fail to understand that science does not work like that. That science is not dogma and reality existed before science and reality exists outside of science. Science is not at fault, some of the dogmatic minds that try to wave a sword around in it's name - are at fault.

There is a big difference between real scientists and "moron audiophiles" that fanatically believe in their "scientific theories".
For scientists if an experiment disproves theory, they conclude the something is wrong in the theory. 
And for "moron audiophiles" everything is exactly opposite. If an experiment (and the experiment in audio it is listening test) disproves theory, they don't believe to their ears. 
I listened a number of systems of such "moron audiophiles" and saw how this  believe in their "scientific theories" leaded them to horrible results!