Moving cables around killed dynamics for days anyone else experience this?

nonoise5,235 posts01-07-2020 8:35pmAll of this reminds me of a cartoon that The Audio Critic had where the audiophile was behind his stereo, holding some cables, and yelling at his family, "Who the hell cleaned back here?", or something like that.

Very funny! Sounds like me. Thanks

The scientific answer to these questions, about the known efficacy and acts committed to gain discernible results... the questions about them... have recently been conclusively answered in the world of reporting on cutting edge physics.

When that goes public enough (this is research and is valuable re product design and so on--so it will not be revealed as to where this data and reporting was found), the naysayers , those ’beat everyone up’ misanthropes...will simply hop onto an attack bandwagon (gangs of roving attack illiterates) on the next thing they are failing to understand.

Expect it like the Spanish inquisition.

the naysayers will poutily say.. "who’s your source on that?" 

And the answer will be akin to "Los Alamos National Laboratory’, or ’the "The Planck institute of Germany", or "MIT", or.....(you get the idea).

But, you see, the noted effect was real for 20-30-40 years before that particular institute comes along and explained the science and physics behind the given noted effect. Time apparently exists but we still can’t get any functional labels on it, they all slide off. Yet everyone here accepts the existence of time.

Just like all the others noted effects that might remain afterward, or came before. Just like reality and 3-d time space has in it, all day long, since the beginnings of time.

That some institute frames the thing today does not mean it did not exist beforehand. Science's explanation is not the arbiter of reality it is just an attempt at framing an explanation. Nothing more. an explanation that is ready to change or be dismissed at any moment. Science. Mutable. By design. Correctly so.

This is one of the core problems of dogmatic minds, with said minds trying to express themselves through higher learning. They fail to understand that science does not work like that. That science is not dogma and reality existed before science and reality exists outside of science. Science is not at fault, some of the dogmatic minds that try to wave a sword around in it's name - are at fault.

There is a big difference between real scientists and "moron audiophiles" that fanatically believe in their "scientific theories".
For scientists if an experiment disproves theory, they conclude the something is wrong in the theory. 
And for "moron audiophiles" everything is exactly opposite. If an experiment (and the experiment in audio it is listening test) disproves theory, they don't believe to their ears. 
I listened a number of systems of such "moron audiophiles" and saw how this  believe in their "scientific theories" leaded them to horrible results!

alexberger

I will go in the same way as you, some walk their illusory and not very humble walks with sometimes vast amount of knowledge, but poor scientific judgement, too much faith and trust in apparatus and available theories and way less in their too human error prone ears... Technical science is useful and necessary, but in their faillible way, even subject to errors, the ears are more important than all dogmas or even facts, because we listen with the ears and it is the ultimate fact that superseded the other facts in importance...

Musical bliss can be and must be produce for sure by a good technical embedding of the audio system, but at the end, the way to increase it more, is not always linked to actual technical known, proved facts...More than that, what is the audible truth for one is anathema for another sometimes... Too much variable to makes rules without many exceptions here...I dont even speak about the many possible personal choices...

Musical bliss is first an individual experience before being or beginning to be a scientific fact, if it is ever....

alexberger

There is a big difference between real scientists and "moron audiophiles" that fanatically believe in their "scientific theories".

Logical fallacy, ad hominem attack times two. Not only do you call those audiophiles with whom you disagree morons, you also label them as fanatics.

Perhaps the difference between audiophiles and those you call "real scientists" is that the audiophiles tend to report their experiences, while those like you engage in illogic and insult.

For scientists if an experiment disproves theory, they conclude the something is wrong in the theory.

If so, that’s a poor scientist. "An experiment" can neither prove nor disprove any theory. It’s just one experiment. For the results to have any scientific validity, the experiment must then be replicated by others, and the results shared and assessed.

I have to wonder why you’re here if you think we’re morons.