Love it when it snows

nutella216 posts01-18-2020 7:34am

Global historical records from NOAA are the basis for the charts and models indicated in that article in the op. https://youtu.be/mGe9JO58Uc8
Fact or hack?
There are legitimate concerns here and need to be either accepted or dismissed based on facts. Unfortunately the response comes as personal insults and name calling and not debating facts.

There you go. Ask yourself this, people. If man-made climate change is such an impending catastrophe, why would the government propose that gigantic industries be allowed to purchase some "carbon credits", to the tune of hundreds of millions, or billions, of dollars, rather than address the "issue"?
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/12/greta_thunbergs_fantastic_voyage_for_socialism_exem...

For heavens sake builder3, American Thinker ?? Really? The site that reports conspiracy theories and pseudoscience? If you want to understand  how carbon credits help reduce emissions try wikipedia. This is worse than trying to discuss evolution with creationists. 

For heavens sake, djones, Wikipedia?? the site where anyone can go write anything?
lol

Peterson the idiot who claims women want to be dominated and says we should force monogamy? Seriously?