To bi wire or not bi wire

This is a tough one to debate. I have gone back and forth so many times, currently on a Canari 4S11 biwire config.

Previously I had a Mapleshade Helix single wire setup where I untwisted a few more inches of wire, scraped off the insulation and fed it up through the second terminal set to create my integrated jumper. Ridiculous how some jumpers cost as much as wire sets.

But after A-B testing, the Canari was noticeably better in bass and mids. I did chop off the Blue Jeans spades off the Canari and I believe that helped too.

I have a Mogami wire coming where I am going to DIY a set of biwire with unterminated connections.

So to biwire or not is a good excuse to try out different configs, if nothing else and it is fun.

I biwire....tried with and without....biwire sounds better to me.  Why not try it yourself

Here is a pretty diplomatic statement from a well respected company.

https://www.cambridgeaudio.com/usa/en/blog/should-you-bi-wire-your-speakers

I'm a Nordost user.

If you decide on BH cables,get the Norse jumpers to compliment them.

The BH power cord, might make a more noticeable impact. It uses the same design as their upscale models.

Speaker cable is last on the list to upgrade according to Nordost philosophy.

FWIW, I tried it both with identical cables from same manufacturer (Tara Labs). One set single wire (using original speaker jumpers) and one set of single bi wire configuration. After a lot of back and forth and I do mean a lot, I found I preferred the single bi wire configuration. It just sounded better. I cannot define exactly what it is but I can say it sounds better to me and I’m the one that matters the most.
I say try it both ways and you decide what sounds best to you. Don’t worry about anybody else’s opinion. It’s you and your ears that you have to please.
PS. Speakers are B&Ws