How old to qualify for vintage?


As the title asks.
unsound
Doesn't hifi already employ a very liberal usage of meaningless superlatives?  Just as "reserve" has no agreed upon, or legal definition in the wine biz,  "reference" appears on many audio products that just ain't,  right?  I actually stumbled upon this site as I was searching for yet another Pioneer SX series receiver about six years ago,  and because of landing here gifted away all of my Marantz, Pioneer stuff.  (For the record I continue to have a soft spot in me head for Pioneer,  Marantz,  and Sansui receivers.)  My ex gf has both a Pioneer and a Marantz receiver in her home...


Obviously I have  a somewhat local "guy" who is capable of keeping them running.  There's always a "guy."

To the topic, I suggest that to be considered vintage a piece of gear should be at least 21 years old.  (Cars are registered as "classic" at 20 years,  correct?)  I cannot think of a piece of consumer-grade gear from 21 years ago that is anywhere near as popular as those 1970's era stereo receivers still are - but then,  I was out of the audio game for a good stretch of time.  It was searching for that Pioneer receiver that started me again.

This being suggested,  the pair of Klipsch CF-3 towers that I bought when I first moved into this house 25 years ago would qualify.  (And they still have a somewhat devoted following amongst Klipschsters currently.)  The Bob Carver cube amp that powered them would also qualify even though I forget what the model designation was.  Definitely the NAD 7020 PE receiver I had whilst living on the beach would qualify,  as well.

I believe that I may have used a Pioneer receiver along with those Klipsch, but I can't be 100% certain.  I never got into separates before finding this site,  so I am obviously dismissing a LOT of gear that contributors to this thread are still fond of.

I'd like to read about 'em.