Wash, Cut, Polish & Demagnetize


As I sat and read through the most recent threads on the "Agon" forum, I noticed a thread regarding "Glossary of Audio Myths". I noticed several comments regarding "greening" and demagnetizing CDs.

Without delving too deeply into the effects of laser light diffraction, deflection, dispersion and reflecting light from adjacent tracks creating "jitter", and to avoid reduntantly examining the fact that the aluminum "wafer" in a CD is not always just aluminum, but in many cases aluminum "alloy", I would like to attempt to dispel a few of these "myths".

Many CD manufacturing facilities use a coating of mold release agents on the manufacturing machinery and on the plastic substrate material in the actual CD to facilitate ease of handling throughout the manufacturing process. Somewhat similar to spraying a cooking pan with "PAM" to reduce sticking. The residual amounts remaining on the CD upon completion of manufacturing should be removed as it will cause minor deflection and loss of focus of the laser beam. Specialty chemicals are available specifically for this purpose. I wash the CDs thoroughly using Dawn dishwashing liquid and very warm water. I cannot confirm that this process is as effective as using the specialty chemicals, but it leaves the CD surface extremely clean and seemingly free from any "oily" feel.

I then cut the edge of the CD using an Audiodesk CD cutter. This process reduces the amount of laser scatter from exiting through the outer edge of the CD and flooding the inside of the CD transport with reflected laser light. By cutting a bevel on the edge of the CD, you actually reduce the edge surface area by which the diffracted laser light can disperse. Some may feel that this a bit excessive, but we must keep in mind that the results of these treatments are cumulative.

The next process involves applying CD "Green" to the beveled edge. The properties of the color value of the Green used in the majority of these coatings tend to absorb any stray laser light. I still, to this day, have not been able to figure out why Green is the color of choice although, I have been told that it is simply the values of each of these colors (Red laser light and Green) that work together in unison to "neutralize" the light. The initial washing of the CD also helps to enhance the adhesion of the green coatings.

Upon allowing the CD green to dry, I then apply CD diamond using 100% cotton balls, and polish using again, cotton balls. CD diamond is an optical enhancer similar to Optrix,
Vivid, etc. and also contains a anti-static component. Most of these "optical enhancers" work by simply filling in microscopic pores in the CD surface permitting a more direct transmission of the laser beam through the plastic substrate material to the actual CD surface.

The last step involves demagnetizing the CD using a Furutech RD-2 CD demagnetizer. CDs, contrary to what most people believe can and will become magnetized. The results are a less black background, a general "haze" and loss of detail. If Cds were made using pure aluminum with NO trace elements, this step might not be required.

The results of all this? Pretty damn amazing. Again, recognizing that the results of all of these steps are cumulative, when all is said and done, the improvement is quite significant. Although these steps may sound somewhat time consuming, each CD actually only takes about three minutes to complete.

I hope I have provided some insight as to "dispelling" some of these myths. I can, and will, stand by this process as time and time again these enhancements have made CDs a lot more listenable. And, I have dropped the jaws of many non-believers after they have heard the actual results.

Any comments regarding this process are welcome. Happy listening.


128x128buscis2
Buscis2 thanks, that pretty much explains it except which side is the bevel? Is the label side or read side larger in dia after beveling? I'll give this a try with Steely Dan's "Two Against Nature" since I have a couple of them.
I followed your link and if this works for you that's fine. But I looked up aluminum alloys in Machinery's Handbook and aluminum is alloyed with copper, silicon, Manganese, Magnesium, or Chromium. Alloying composition listed down to .06%. So any iron impurities would be less than .06%.
Have you ever tried to magnetize aluminum foil? Okay, I am stupid enough to be sucked into trying this. Although I don't have a pulsed capacitance magnetizer I can get high enough to prove (to myself at least) whether it can be done.
Yes you could use a CNC turning center. You could also use an NC milling machine with a bevel cutter and interpolate a circular cut. But the point I was making is that the same job could be done for less money than your typical "audiophile" equipment.
Yes I radially polish the disc using a microfiber lense cleaning cloth from Walmart ($1.99) and Novus #1. A little heavy breathing to fog up the CD shows up areas that need further polishing. Vocals, for example, are clearer using Novus than just a plastic cleaner alone IMS. I did not like other polishes like Mapleshade Microsmooth as it put scratches in the CD. Novus doesn't.
Hi Cdc, The bevel is applied to the data side. The label side is the larger diameter (actually unaltered diameter).

As you probably read, Furutech feels that the impurities in the aluminum in conjunction with the ferrous metals in the paint that provide the ability to become magnetized. I don't know.
I can tell you that there is a definite improvement in the sound with just using the Furutech alone.

You and I are absolute agreement on the cost of the Audiodesk @ $600.00. It's ridiculous. But then again, I also think it's ridiculous for someone to spend $6000.00 for a set of speaker cables. Yet many people do it. I personally feel that an investment of $600.00 becomes more understandable if you consider the amount of money you may have invested in your CD collection. I have over 700 CDs. figure that out at an average of $12.00 a CD.

Yes, Novus is a great product although I have never thought of using it on CDs. Hmmm.
Busics2, that actually works out to less than .86¢ per CD. Unless you're totaling the purchase price of the CD plus the cost of treatment.
You're correct Albert. And if you did add the costs of all materials involved in doing a complete treatment, I have a sneaky suspicion that the total costs would be less than $ 1.00 per CD. Considering the overall improvement, I feel that it is more than justifiable. And obviously, the more CDs you actually own, the lower the cost per CD processed.

I have spent significantly more more money per CD purchasing XRCDs, MFSL CDs, and other "audiophile" CDs. I personally feel that the improvement provided by using this process, puts the average redbook CD on the same playing field as all of the other aforementioned CDs. We also need to consider that the improvements we discussed, can be applied to any CD you may have in your collection including any "audiophile" CD.

But, we also must consider that you can't make a silk purse from a sow's ear. If it's a bad sounding CD, it is probably going to stay that way no matter what you do.
Yowza !!! I can't believe that the price on the Audio Desk's went up that much. Believe me, i did not pay that much for mine. What i did pay for it was still too much for what it is. Then again, the amount of time that it would take to build something equivalent would have to be factored in and ease of use and the convenience of having all of the bugs worked out do add up to product cost. Sean
>