I've got about 35 hours on my new Nenuphars, swapping between First Watt SIT-3 and LTA Ultralinear amps. The break-in changes to SQ have been subtle and what you would expect--increase in depth, smoother highs, tighter bass. But the difference between the two amps is not subtle. SIT-3 is more mid-range and mid-bass oriented, slightly darker, earthier. A tunefully dense, very engaging sound. The Ultralinear is like switching to a brighter bulb, recording space more visible, more air and dimension to instruments and voices, better dynamics. I find this openness to be even more seductive than the SIT-3, delivering a heightened sense of you-are-there. Bass is very similar, tuneful, tight and deep with both--interesting since the two amps have very different damping factors (LTA being about 1/5th of the SIT-3). Maybe the distinction in bass will become greater once the speakers have had a chance to break in more. If I had to make the choice right now--more a matter of taste because they both are a great match--I would pick the LTA. To me it just offers more of the magic these speakers make. Which begs the question: "Would a 2A3 or 300b amp often even more?" I've put the word out locally for a loaner...but that's just audiophilia curiosity talking. I'm a totally enthralled camper with the Ultralinear.