LP made from a digital master recording...


The digital vs. analog thoughts, even debates I can understand...when the analog LP is from analog masters.  When an LP is pressed using a digital master recording as the source, does that LP still have an analog advantage?   
whatjd
There's a great little article in a Brit audio magazine I read a while back that makes the point about why analog from digital sounds better than digital...of course I can't find the article...damn...but it's true.
This is easy to compare

Maybe for same reasons some people use digital playback with Tube Amps or Preamps instead of Class D digital amps. 



My guess is that analog signal has ''endless many values'' while
digital has limited values (aka ''on'' and ''off''). 
That's right, with an analog source vinyl will always be preferable. Provided the record manufacturing process doesn't have any intermediairy digital steps, which would throw all the benefits of the infinite analog signal out of the window.

With digital sources it's a crap shoot. In most cases, CD's are produced with much compression, while the vinyl made from a digital master may not. In that case the vinyl will likely be superior. All else being equal, which it usually isn't.
edgewear218 posts02-19-2020 12:17pm
... with an analog source vinyl will always be preferable. Provided the record manufacturing process doesn't have any intermediairy digital steps, which would throw all the benefits of the infinite analog signal out of the window.
The "analog signal" on an LP is not "infinite." Not even close. It's a bandwidth-limited signal, and so is digital.