Higher End DACs

One does not normally start with a conclusion, they start with a premise, "The audible effects caused by RF noise are difficult to objectively measure yet are simultaneously subtle and obvious. Suffice it to say that they manifest as a reduction in musical transparency and increasedlistening fatigue. " 


Curious how you were able to listen to headphones/speakers which would transmit RF back to your DAC (you claim direct connection, no amplifier).

In your white paper, you use a log-periodic antenna rated for 1Ghz-18Ghz (or 1Ghz -2Ghz model dependent). That will be great to cover intentional radiators, but most RF energy from unintentional sources is well below that. Testing below 1GHz would be far more useful in most environments. Curiously you show results down to 100KHz for which your antenna would be poor. What you identify as standard radio communications and microwave radio communications in your "Rural Isolation Ambient Zero Baseline" are predominantly VHF and UHF television (UHF = 470-806). (p.s. Your sweep times are way too short for high quality measurements).


Of course, shielding the outside of the DAC doesn't negate likely the largest unintentional RF components (by intensity), namely components inside the DAC. Of course, most DACs do seem to have metal cases which are effectively Faraday cages, so sensitive circuitry with the exception of cable entry would be covered.

W.R.T. claims of "Sounds Better", there is no discussion of the test protocol, the number of testers, etc. so I guess we just "trust you"?  A future test is identified as "Double blind listening tests with a variety of subjects/music"   I would think proving a problem exists would be the first thing to do?

I didn’t find where the White Paper discussed RF coming in through the windows. Maybe I missed it. But RF comes in from outside, all kinds of it, where it can easily migrate into unused wall outlets, unused input and output jacks of electronics, holes in electronics, and into unshielded cabling. The entire room is lit up like a Christmas tree. 🎄 As I stated earlier the first line of defense should be the windows. And the unused wall outlets the second line of defense. 

Why does my cell phone work in a windowless room ????

Glass is more transparent to RF but photons can travel through solid building structures, too. Like a knife through butter 🧈  Elevators (metal) not so much. That’s why reception improves as you move toward the window in many cases. Depends on where the signal is coming from, etc. Sometimes 24” can make all the difference.